SHA256(a.zip)= d38ce06832f7a48b7a2b1e13dac0e21ef7064a962b4e80e1c97d08715d96a3b9
这是昌用老师在上课？
Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash - Enabling new economies with low fee micro-transactions, large business transactions, and permissionless spending.
377a bcaf 271c 0004 7355 e64f 1085 0000
0000 0000 3800 0000 0000 0000 c675 0a80
9d6a 93c5 6a5c c552 1b94 fbd5 2d3c acea
9ab0 6969 7d34 caca 721b e10b 7a1e 91d5
f5ff bce1 a794 fe4e d678 0bfc 6dd0 5164
bc15 7ddd 55be debf 1db1 e831 5f05 85e1
d25f 1685 bcb3 c94f 0396 3e24 3785 2df9
3af2 1190 2609 4a97 bfa5 b8b8 d80f 8266
cc69 a9fb eb20 4750 dab1 23b1 5dbe c44e
067f c042 8fe5 bdc0 df61 e10b edfb 81df
3e1b 0fa3 5894 8dd8 2eaf 5c49 40ec ee02
e4cc 3b45 b710 a251 d749 cac4 c5a2 59a3
d1f2 2636 6bbb 1942 d46d 1f16 3d8d 77d7
12df 902d 2e3d f60c c748 eb60 00dd a441
2d04 60aa a57d b5da ebe1 2b78 0bb3 7eab
3085 1b86 a292 9c10 8a9d 7b58 e79a 8581
ee1d e787 8134 d7e6 f11e 7dde 3bf9 74ab
f02b acb3 336c 9f20 bfc7 53d4 9cc4 7621
675e 1343 dd31 a85f 5c55 441f 6d04 b739
3edc ac8b 31e8 5a98 d35b 44a4 b998 00fe
55d2 f189 2632 a329 e8c0 b192 0248 9d8e
dce0 584c 3cd5 11bb f57a 7a9a fcfa 8c3d
8c98 c083 2a8b 32d0 8170 dd03 b452 35f0
7875 a94c c971 1824 dcbb 89d3 34f4 5b4c
c54a 8ff4 7ad7 8f8c 9917 7c15 ccf3 f8...
Is this a 7zip file? I tried to de-compress it but failed.
yes, pre-consensus make 0-conf more reliable when scaling. Without it, 0-conf just a mess when the network traffic peaking.
How Memo is handling the BCH fork: https://memo.cash/bch-fork
Well done memo, best wishes, it's time to move on. Both BCH and BSV.
Being that you are in such a hurry for protocol upgrades, I hear POS is coming to ABC soon! More like 15 weeks rather than 15 years. You'll love it!
POS is not ready, POW is still the best way to achieve decentralized consensus. BCH will never refuse technologies which can make it better. Scaling is the most important thing.
Not arguing here, just asking a question you can not answer. And running out of time.
I am glad SV forked off. So BCH can focus on become the best money, for everyone daily use.
Not arguing here, just asking a question you can not answer. And running out of time.
If you take a look on every success technology achievement, no technology lock themself. IP protocol upgrade rarely because it relate to hardware. Incompatible change cause greate lose
Not arguing here, just asking a question you can not answer. And running out of time.
bitcoin runs totally based on software, except the asic miner. upgrade is an easy thing, just change or add a few lines of code will not cause someone lose money.
Surprise! It's been here since January 9, 2009.
If you want 0.1, you should disable p2sh TXs at first. If you do so, most "satoshi" OP_CODEs will be useless.
Not arguing here, just asking a question you can not answer. And running out of time.
So, no major updates to IPv4 you can name, huh?
If you think
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791 defines IPV4, and that's the base of the internet not including any of the extension/ high level protocols, I am not arguing with you.
Why do you think Bitcoin v0.1has never changed, just because the name is the same?
If you think Bitcoin v0.1 can win, just build it. Tell Craig, stop attacking people will make BSV a brighter furture.
IPv6 is 20 years old. Why haven't you upgraded?
Why do you think the ipv6 has never changed by 20 years? Just because the name is still the same?
I don't see one major update there at all. Just a link salad.
I give you a much simpler counter example. The Netscape browser on my ancient 2002 laptop still shows many websites.
I think BTC is ready for u.
In the case that Memo only supports one chain, which chain do you prefer?
| BCH |
47 votes
· 9,563 satoshis
|
| BSV |
52 votes
· 15,267 satoshis
|
Results
Creating...
Broadcasting...
IPv6 would get mass adoption if people destroyed the internet and started over. They should have done that in 2000. Missed opportunity. Let's not miss this one to get the real Bitcoin.
I am using IPV6 daily.
Show me one major IPV4 upgrade.
Again, IPv6 is here after 30 years and nowhere near massive adoption.
Why do you say "Lock the protocol have no chance to win"? Internet protocol has been locked now for 30 years.
No, IPV4 is upgrading many times, for the massive adoption, now it is upgrading to IPV6
BSV will thrive. It is the closest to the original Satoshi vision. It was created to defend against contentious protocol changes that will prevent massive adoption.
Lock the protocol have no chance to win, even BTC core is seeking ways to upgrade, they choose Segwit, BCH choose big block, SV choose to lock itself.
Re-orgs aren't an issue, having two separate chains is what needs to be dealt with.
Memo should choose the winner, ABC is the winner obviously.
