couldn't you use the public/private key relationship already in BCH.. e.g. have an address just for PM that encrypts with public key/decrypts with private key
Ok, looks like you'd be happy with an accurate NSFW cat.
OK lets see how the all or nothing approach goes. I think it's silly to 1) have it on by default when content is un-revokable 2) not allow per user and per post disabling
I think the problem is once memo take responsibility for filtering content, then you have to police all the content. Especially potentially illegal content. So better if it's user mediated
maybe filter by a string of chars in the title with brackets around it. In this case it might be [NSFW]. That way the info stays on the blockchain without needing more metadata
@Pewdiepie88 encouraged people to tip more. I want people to post more. I hope to see a day when refreshing the ranked page every hour or so shows me new content.
Followed. That would actually be confusing unless they organise the topics a bit better.
Remember BCH will never hit 0. It will always have some value.
Well you can be in a coma and still be alive also, technically. BCH has value in the uses is creates. Memo being an example. Fall in price actually makes posting cheaper - a good thing
it goes against the "immutable and uncensorable" thing - they're gonna have to work out exactly what they want to be unless you want nasty stuff in your face by default - e.g. gifs and youtubes
interesting example of how one contribution can spoil an entire thread.. and can't be moderated in anyway. Easy way for BTC people to spoil the whole memo idea