if they had any intention to fix the issue, they wouldn't be shilling for government gibs, they'd be looking for investors to make CO2 useful, like exxtra said
unfortunately for silentsam, none of these undeniable experts are willing to put their money where their mouth is, so we must follow their words and ignore their actions
What universal change did the Unibomber want? not familiar with the details of the event.
Unibomber wanted a global revolution against technology. Obviously, any nation left untouched would be able to sweep the table and reimpose, so its a demand for universal self harm
i'm fine with hierarchies, just not artificial, military imposed, pillage funded hierarchies.
anarchy, but instead creating a change within government that will inevitably weaken it. just enough of a poison pill to keep them on the back foot as they slowly fade
i see the world in a sort of post-anarchy lense, once a big guy gets enough guns the show is over, and thats where we are today. I guess now the idea is less instating or enforcing
thats why I hate politics on reddit, it's almost exclusively fake. 4chan/pol/ feels at least 2/3 fake now too. to answer the premise though, everything beyomd facts may as well be propoganda
to be clear, in this scenario, there would be no legislative or judicial powers at the federal level, and we could say at the state level as well. perhaps a slow implimentation too.
If the US military fell back to the coasts and boarders, and government was reduced to simply the military, could the US survive as an "anarcho"capitalist nation?
and UBI is retarded psuedo-communism, just raise the verteran pensions, same shit, less fuckery
thats why Marx and the Unibomber could never succeed, their idea required unanimous support because single implimentation would be self weakening, thus self suicide.
trying to impliment a global government is inherently uphill, since it would be in direct contradiction to the direction of strength (above). a path of weakness always loses
gloablism as a one world government is not only every distopiqn set up, it's the exact opposite of the leading economic trend, smaller government with an exploration into city-state creation
Capitalism vs anything else always comes down to "how much of your shit are people allowed to steal?"
you can agree to something without a government being there, and governance is not government
I watched this guy before, he is typical defender of Capitalism and is full of shit. he sees everything through $$$ which is worst thing any person can do.
How could being richer make a country worse?
