Why does 0-conf need to be made safer? I used 0-conf 100x on Satoshi dice just fine. 0-conf is not 100% safe and not meant to be. Merchants accept that small risk for more business
Keep in mind that Satoshi dice uses your transaction output to pay out your winnings, if you double spend the payout will be invalid aswell.
Automatic shuffling isn't implemented in CashShuffle. It all is done manually in the plugin tab in Electron Cash. Aside from fixed amounts, high minimums etc. there are numerous issues
it can be added as a plugin is what is my point. the layman wouldn't have to understand anything, as it can be fully automated, which is only possible because it is trustless
Uh, drawbacks are drawbacks. CashShuffle is less functional than a traditional mixer with no improvement in fungibility and obfuscation. Trustless doesn't make those issues go away.
I'd argue it does, by automatically shuffling your wallet we will have really big pools and the same amount of BCH issue wouldn't be problematic either if enough people participate
Traditional mixing services are better than CashShuffle imo
Which isn't really a good thing. Protocol layer fungibility is a must have.
the difference is that it's trustless, which makes it viable for automatic integration into your wallet software. drawbacks aren't really an issue in that case
Maybe. Every time I've asked about it I've just had CashShuffle shoved at me. CashShuffle isn't fungibility. It's decentralized mixing. Nothing special about it.
I'd consider it 'good enough', protocol layer fungibility would make global adoption too difficult imo