Did you know, in Switzerland we can vote if we want taxes. The people voted yes.
Logical. All else aside, either taxes or printing money will pay for public goods
I extract my own wealth out of my own labors while the government takes my wealth through theft.
taxes you mean;)
Which mining profitability calculator do you prefer, and why?
sec compliant, token holders getting Nexo company profit shares.
https://sludgefeed.com/nexo-announces-912000-dividend/
This is amazing! Good to know that there exist projects that are still making money. Also, wouldn't Nexo be considered a security since token holders are able to share its earnings?
Keep eye on NEXO asap ;-)
Its green! Any idea why?
So why you compare public checkpoints with hidden checkpoints, known only to selected miners and exchanges?
What's a hidden checkpoint?
You can't hide things in open source. I just sent you the link to the code.
I can't help but feel that open source is very much like "Terms and Conditions", its always there but not enough people look at it
I think there is like one antminer running the entire ABC chain now 😂
Thats one powerful mining machine then lol
Why does it feel like this chat discussion here is >50% about SV these days? And why is it almost exclusively bashing BCH instead of being productive?
Love how you said BCH there!
I am thankful for the humility that Crypto has taught me this year!
BitcoinSV roadmap is so simple, I finally sleep well. The changes have to be simple enough that average user can understand because that’s the investor
Alternatively, you could make the protocol usable for more users.
Fucking weird.
It's the split that isn't but is but isn't.
Precisely. Think they should "officially" be seen as separate chains already.
Yes they are scared. The SV hash is not visible, shadow mining empty blocks to re-org ABC so they need to have a very high (above equilibrium) hash rate to prevent a deep reorg.
Seems mighty unlikely since SV will have to reorg 685 (557452-556767) blocks since ABC's checkpoint checkpoint
SEC's stance of increased regulation has a part to play too
No one likes the idea that their multi-million dollar investments can be broken because of a chain split, 51% attack or chain reorg. We're fucked.
SEC's stance of increased regulation has a part to play too
Successful I'd say. ahahah
Bitcoin.com showed my memo.cash transaction, which means it was on ABC and there are way too many SV proponents here, thus it has to work on SV too(the SV explorers dont work too well)
They're going for the kill. They're working on a hidden ABC chain. Notice ABC is rocketing to defend. If if they weren't afraid they wouldn't pile it on like this.
Don't they have to rework from 556767 now that there is a checkpoint? (which sounds damn near impossible)
What are we using on memo?
Still both I think
This basically means that the hash of block 556767 should be the value in the quotes above. Hashes can't be generated on demand (and are not deterministic).
Shadow mining, if done by SV after block 556757 is useless and needs to be redone since at least one block before that. Therefore, it helps prevent re-org attacks.
ELI5 on ABC's checkpoint:
A line of code which looks like:
{556767, uint256S("0000000000000000004626ff6e3b936941d341c5932e"
"ce4357eeccac44e6d56c")}
This basically means that the hash of block 556767 should be the value in the quotes above. Hashes can't be generated on demand (and are not deterministic).
ELI5 on ABC's checkpoint:
A line of code which looks like:
{556767, uint256S("0000000000000000004626ff6e3b936941d341c5932e"
"ce4357eeccac44e6d56c")}
