The truth is, this type of work you say businesses owners do, is NOWHERE NEAR, NOT EVEN CLOSE WORTH THE AMOUNTS OF WEALTH THEY ACCUMULATE FROM WORK OF OTHERS.
Strawman after strawman.
Lot of companies have spokes people, people doing this exact thing, large businesses have CEO do this if its big fuck up but not the owner, so no, you are not correct at all.
Ok, tell your CEO the next time an angry customer makes a complaint, you will handle it.
They are not busy "giving me work", they only look for workers when THEY NEED SOMEONE TO MAKE THEM MONEY, which is proven with times when they sack people when the're no longer needed.
[citation needed]
Sometimes I question myself on why I even care to save earth. It’s inhabited by so many morons.
aww your heart is just too big! (¬_¬ ) "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken
Do I have to be? I know logic. Logic says owning something is NOT WORK & PRODUCES NOTHING. If you want to say they provide jobs, then WHY DO THEY SACK PEOPLE WHEN THEY DON'T NEED THEM?
I don't even need to tell you the consequences of a company who has provided a bad service. Even just a one-off mistake or a simple overlook in protocol. Its a butterfly effect.
Do I have to be? I know logic. Logic says owning something is NOT WORK & PRODUCES NOTHING. If you want to say they provide jobs, then WHY DO THEY SACK PEOPLE WHEN THEY DON'T NEED THEM?
They're the people who confront angry customers when YOU workers make a mistake or a fuck up. You often don't bear the brunt of the consequences and only get a yelling by your manager.
Do I have to be? I know logic. Logic says owning something is NOT WORK & PRODUCES NOTHING. If you want to say they provide jobs, then WHY DO THEY SACK PEOPLE WHEN THEY DON'T NEED THEM?
I don't know about you, but business owners are busy trying to give you work so that you CAN work and earn a wage. They go out to meetings with clients and promote the company.
Do I have to be? I know logic. Logic says owning something is NOT WORK & PRODUCES NOTHING. If you want to say they provide jobs, then WHY DO THEY SACK PEOPLE WHEN THEY DON'T NEED THEM?
You MUST show that you're worth more than what the business owner is paying you to be even CONSIDERED to get preferential treatment over other employees.
Do I have to be? I know logic. Logic says owning something is NOT WORK & PRODUCES NOTHING. If you want to say they provide jobs, then WHY DO THEY SACK PEOPLE WHEN THEY DON'T NEED THEM?
Saying that you're entitled for a higher salary just because you exist is selfish and immoral. You will be paid for the work or service that you provide.
Do I have to be? I know logic. Logic says owning something is NOT WORK & PRODUCES NOTHING. If you want to say they provide jobs, then WHY DO THEY SACK PEOPLE WHEN THEY DON'T NEED THEM?
Give the business owner a reason as to why they should pay you with a higher salary as opposed to another colleague of yours. Why should they pick you vs. them?
Do I have to be? I know logic. Logic says owning something is NOT WORK & PRODUCES NOTHING. If you want to say they provide jobs, then WHY DO THEY SACK PEOPLE WHEN THEY DON'T NEED THEM?
Employees in companies get sacked for a variety of reasons. If you're not providing enough value to your work, you'll be sacked. Simple as that.
Do I have to be? I know logic. Logic says owning something is NOT WORK & PRODUCES NOTHING. If you want to say they provide jobs, then WHY DO THEY SACK PEOPLE WHEN THEY DON'T NEED THEM?
Of course you do have to be a business owner to understand what you're talking about. Do people bust into the room in hospitals claiming that they're doctors because "I know logic?"
Thats so misguided & completely wrong. Just owning something does not fullfil any needs of business. Owning does no produce anything, workers do everything with their work.
Are you a business owner?
"The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name." - Confucius.
Yes, that is a good thing, having workers own the business they work in. But if owner was to have 51% or more of business share, he still gets to dictate terms of business.
And they subsequently perform >51% of the company's needs.
Ahhhhh! But they can't steal my bitcoin cash if I flush my phone down the toilet!!
Or steal your phone for that matter...
Nope, but if I ever am, my bitcoin cash is staying with me 👍
Good.
And you'd like to add your Bitcoin Cash onto that as well? 'I'm going to take your car, your cash, empty your bank and oh I see you have Bitcoin Cash, I'll take that too'.
Have you been mugged before?
For someone to get my wallet out of my pocket, they would have to hope I am rich, and then proceed to mug me. If I wore this, they could first check how rich I am, then decide.
Phones are pretty advanced and widespread nowadays. Wallets can not just contain cash, but debit or credit cards. If you happen to have just exited your car, they may take that too.
So you don't walk around with a wallet or plastic? Since you might get robbed?
Touché.
Just in a practical sense, I can get the same QR code from just unlocking my phone. If I didnt have my phone with me, I'd maybe print off my QR code and stick it in my actual wallet.
So you don't walk around with a wallet or plastic? Since you might get robbed?
Its tipping Tuesday, reply to this post to get 10,000 satoshis!
I shall return the love to my fellow peers.
this is mine shirt
I also looking for interesting picture to front.
Perhaps the honeybadger?
"Maybe if I throw another ad hominem, it will work." - LightRider
I get what your saying, but blocking one guy who can't go anywhere's internet access is orders of magnitude easier than stopping smuggling in thousands of prisons.
It is a sad, sad world...
