OK. Q is saying "Here is a picture and a few words, impossibly scarce all in all. Either manipulate yourself by drawing unfounded conclusions or feel I am superior to you"
How about this: CSW is compromised by the elite for a divide and conquer strategy (BCH vs BSV). So he both says/does a lot of crazy stuff and makes the technologically best chain on purpose
It is great to see some real talk in here, as opposed to the usual trench warfare of "Capitalism is great!" "No it's terrible!" "No, it's great and you are a ...." nonsense and LR astroturfing!
Anyone have a grip on the social-media-on-blockchain picture for BSV? Weiblock is mentioned above, and I believe I have heard of other plans (but I could be mixing stuff up)
I like the Roger Waters phase of Pink Floyd! I suppose I actually like Roger Waters (the Amused to death album is amazing), but he was an integral part of Pink Floyd for quite a while
User -ED- probably posted the above on memo.sv, and it "automatically" ended up here. He has said a lot more about the issue on memo.sv. Nothing worth reading I'd say, but much text.
For those who find all this a bit confusing, due to a technicality, when you make a transaction on one of BSV/BCH chains, the transaction may end up on both. Memo messages have the same property
Careful where you have skin in the game. You will be pulled between these things, often so hard that you lose a big part of yourself while defending them.
I did not pretend no one responded, but to me nobody worthy responded. I have discussed this with SILENTSAM before, and made it clear that I find him to be not worthy my time. Same for LR.
Trying to survive is fine, but if someone (evil?) misdirects your efforts, so you work with the wrong issues then it may not be such a good idea, until you have removed the misdirection.
Now, the "we have only a few years left" claim, that has been used at least since the 80's, and those few years have passed twice or more by now. That part seems a complete lie to me
And I think the debate is crazy with people just shouting at each other instead of giving the rest of us data to check for ourselves. Very hard to be totally sure of anything because of this
Who me? I think the whole debate has been misdirected from 80's where there was talk of NOX. Real environment problems do exist, but CO2 concerns look to me like negligible in seriousness.
I feel no obligation to take seriously a liar who has shown that she does not care about her the righteousness cause, but still annoys the majority here with it, and even calls for violence
This is the age of misinformation, hard to tell. But it seems to me others put her up to this. Also it seems to me that this media storm will not lessen her anxiety to put it mildly.
Question to global warming alarmists: Suppose you were wrong about your view on the issue, what would it take to change your mind? How could any counterargument not just make you more angry?
About diversity: Diversity is nothing magical, it can be good or bad. To use it as an argument in favor of immigration enforced on the population is disingenuous
Anyone want to argue in favor of the idea that hiding information about scientific data on differences in IQ between races is somehow necessary? Or that it is "racist" to be open about such things?