I must concede that I am not aware of a democracy that seems to be working as I'd want, though your slogan gives the impression of an absolute law
In the interest of good relations, I suppose I can stretch that far.
Oh, I was hoping I could call a can't opener that doesn't work a can't't opener, but that is right out the window now I suppose.
Ah, but what do you then call an opener for a can't?
I suppose hints are not your thing. Anyway, what you describe could still be called a tax. In theory, we decide on the taxes ourselves in democracies
How about sweeping generalizations, oversimplifications and intellectual laziness, what are those?
OK, can we compromise and say that wealth tax and sales tax are both super fair, and that 100% of both would be best?
Here's what I did. 1. Don't drink stuff with alcohol in it. 2. ... I guess there isn't a step 2, or was that where you collect underpants? 3. Profit!
You're doing it again! Penguins don't have houses or igloos or glue. Therefore, THAT'S NOT FUNNY !!
I really struggle to see what you are trying to say here that is not a complete non sequitor
Also, in general, people being "angry" are often easily brushed aside in discussions, since they come off a bit as clowns, and as a blockage to civilized conversation.
This unfortunately happens whether or not the label "angry" is deserved or not.
an outlet for his anger before we can help him, but he has nothing useful to say. All nonsense of course, but still a majority of our population seems to have this attitude these days.
Also, in general, people being "angry" are often easily brushed aside in discussions, since they come off a bit as clowns, and as a blockage to civilized conversation.
and they also read the "angry" part as us being extremist far right types. So what they hear is that this far right nazi type is just being emotionally unstable (angry) and he needs...
an outlet for his anger before we can help him, but he has nothing useful to say. All nonsense of course, but still a majority of our population seems to have this attitude these days.
this fact. In this setting, when they hear of men being "angry" about mens rights issues, they see someone trying to stop their own fight for good in order to support the bad men,...
and they also read the "angry" part as us being extremist far right types. So what they hear is that this far right nazi type is just being emotionally unstable (angry) and he needs...
mention unmanly). In reality of course, women are the most privileged half of the world, but since they think emotionally and not logically they can easily ignore all the signs of...
this fact. In this setting, when they hear of men being "angry" about mens rights issues, they see someone trying to stop their own fight for good in order to support the bad men,...
monopolize the victim role (you will seem a bit like a victim when talking about rights of your own group, but "men can't be victims", therefore you are weak and delusional, not to...
mention unmanly). In reality of course, women are the most privileged half of the world, but since they think emotionally and not logically they can easily ignore all the signs of...
Add to this that they are told both by their own instincts and culture/media the lie that they are oppressed, and this has gone so far that they instinctively always try to...
monopolize the victim role (you will seem a bit like a victim when talking about rights of your own group, but "men can't be victims", therefore you are weak and delusional, not to...
world. They don't see their own selfishness in this picture, instead they see themselves as the only people who fight for good in this world, while the men are doing all the evil.
Add to this that they are told both by their own instincts and culture/media the lie that they are oppressed, and this has gone so far that they instinctively always try to...
This is especially true of women and even more so of feminists. Further, while feminists are usually willfully ignorant and selfish, they also have a real intention of improving the...
world. They don't see their own selfishness in this picture, instead they see themselves as the only people who fight for good in this world, while the men are doing all the evil.
I know exactly what you mean, but I would not use the word angry, as I have learned it is problematic. All people to a certain degree base their thinking on emotions rather than logic.
This is especially true of women and even more so of feminists. Further, while feminists are usually willfully ignorant and selfish, they also have a real intention of improving the...
I know exactly what you mean, but I would not use the word angry, as I have learned it is problematic. All people to a certain degree base their thinking on emotions rather than logic.
It is great to see some real talk in here, as opposed to the usual trench warfare of "Capitalism is great!" "No it's terrible!" "No, it's great and you are a ...." nonsense and LR astroturfing!
I have only read the "one lesson" part so far. It spells out something that has driven me nuts for ages. Not just economists but i.e. most politicians violate this principle.
That book is freely (and legally) downloadable here: https://archive.org/details/HenryHazlittEconomicsInOneLesson
I have only read the "one lesson" part so far. It spells out something that has driven me nuts for ages. Not just economists but i.e. most politicians violate this principle.
