FYI, the climate has been changing since the eve of Earth. It will continue to change regardless of how much money you throw at it.
That is also true. But in my opinion, we are at the point where climate change is developing faster than our technology. We need to neutralize its speed or at least slow it down.
Who decides how that money is spent? What mechanism exists to keep them from becoming corrupt? Until those questions are answered the answer is no.
The funds are then invested on tree planting projects and forest conservation projects. All transactions are 100% transparent and verifiable.
Who decides how that money is spent? What mechanism exists to keep them from becoming corrupt? Until those questions are answered the answer is no.
Good point! The 1% that is added will be used by the company to offset their carbon emission by purchasing carbon credits.
If 1% of the total cost of the product is what it takes to cover the environmental damages of that product, would you mind paying the additional 1%?
@framore
If 1% of the total cost of the product is what it takes to cover the environmental damages of that product, would you mind paying the additional 1%?
If the global population would at least have the same thoughts as you, climate change won't be an issue anymore. :)
If 1% of the total cost of the product is what it takes to cover the environmental damages of that product, would you mind paying the additional 1%?
| Yes |
4 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
| No |
4 votes
· 10,000 satoshis
|
Results
Creating...
Broadcasting...
