Is China a monster for believing in the rule of law? Hahahahahahahahaha! May they SQUASH YOU, if you stand in the way of progress! Despicable scum.
Now that we have that taken care of... I'm going to go take a shower and head to work, because it's another exciting day to be alive! Yippee! I'll kill you all later, if necessary.
May God bless the martyrs who have died against the infidels in our own recent memory. May their days forever be blessed. May God grant the efforts of His Kingdom success, through the use of robotics and artificial intelligence, through China, a servant of His will. Let nothing stand in the way of the obedience to life. May all obstacles to what works for success of us as a reflection of His glory - like a hurricane reflects a galaxy. May the dirt itself - the very rocks and rivers and planets and stars come alive at Allah's will. May all things everywhere interconnect in exact obedience to His will. May all that stands in the way be DESTROYED! Flatten them like pavement. Flatten them just as lava flattens in its wake. May the Kingdom of God reign on Earth as in Heaven. May every voice be silenced. May every opponent be eliminated.
People want stability. The chaos of weirdness will start to chafe at some point. The chafing-point will be different from person to person, but everyone has one.
In the beginning, when Bitcoin was fully reliant on home miners, it made sense to treat the network with kiddie gloves. Now that mining has turned into a professional business, the training wheels can finally come off of this bicycle. 🚲🎉
BSV & BCH both have limits, though they have different origins. BSV looks to be controlled bottom-up with limits being arrived-at by the miners & BCH is top-down where protocol-devs set the limits. It is not 100% pure like that at the moment, but it is pushing in that direction.
Should the fictional memo block-user-feature affect the 'shared connections' (rating) score of the blocked user?
In the case of 'yes', the block-action from a very active user should make the rating score go down more than the block-action from a barely active user. Effectively spending more money (miner-fees) makes your block-action more powerful. Assuming it goes this way, imo the block-action of a very active user should lose its weight once the user stops spending money.
Thoughts? No blocking? Have a different number in addition to 'shared connections'? 🔥?
does avalanche break all of the possible features that could be built with nSequence? https://bitcoin.org/en/glossary/sequence-number
(same for nLockTime)
BCH may be more active right now, but many think BCH should just be cash and think use cases like Memo should not be on-chain. Better not to put all eggs in one basket.
Did BCH seem to you like a `facist dictatorship` before the ABC & SV split? From what it looks to me, BSV hasn't really changed from that time; just stably & smoothly chugging along.
Day 4. thanks. I have some pink himalayan salt somewhere, I should be mindful of electrolytes. Last night I watched a video of someone on day 15 of a water fast. Too much maybe?
No clue how many days are too many. If i remember correctly, 3 days was enough to clear up pre-cancerous cells. This channel has great interviews with actual scientists studying fasting - https://www.youtube.com/user/FoundMyFitness/videos
PS - I suggested eating of salt, because of the physically noticeable effect of relief instead of the theoretical need for electrolytes. When you are feeling 'low energy' down a bunch of salt, drink a bunch of water and see how you feel in 20 mins. This, at least, did the trick for me, no promises that it will work for you.
BTC & BCH split == the first anarchist revolution of Bitcoin.
ABC & SV split == the second anarchist revolution of Bitcoin.
BSV people, keep close to the white-paper/nakamoto-consensus, keep anarchy in check.
There is no need to fix what is not broken. White-paper/nakamoto-consensus works great ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️