The BEST way to explain what Avalanche is and how it can work for BCH as well as AVA is using an animated doodle. Would someone please make one?
Now there's an alternative: adjust to zero-conf PoW, or adopt PoS rejuvenated/perfected with Avalanche.
The issue with PoS was when it is coupled with Nakamoto consensus, isn't it?
Apologies, I seemed to have missed your point.
So what are you implying with "it's still critical for gaining control of the network" before?
The BEST way to explain what Avalanche is and how it can work for BCH as well as AVA is using an animated doodle. Would someone please make one?
I am now optimistic of Avalanche.
Yes and no. Basically the old benefit of 51% is "few confirmations" accommodating a split for a double-spend. With Avalanche, network control can cause a sway. But remains _not_ split.
Yup. It is now clearly stated at the bottom of the "Sell Tokens/List Tokens for Sale" page, just below the confirmation button.
I hate it when I messed up an image link on the blockchain!
Yup. It is now clearly stated at the bottom of the "Sell Tokens/List Tokens for Sale" page, just below the confirmation button.
I just saw your video interviewing Chris Pacia.
Now I get it. Thank you!
For BCH, it is an add-on pre-consensus method on top of existing PoW algorithm.
AVA instead uses it as a consensus method, as opposed to Nakamoto's, coupled with PoS algorithm.
I think they're 2 different things though, Emin is building a new coin from the ground up just using Avalanche, Chris is using avalanche for preconsensus on bch
I just saw your video interviewing Chris Pacia.
Now I get it. Thank you!
If Avalanche can be applied to BCH, that would be awesome. However, I have to be honest I have yet to understand how this is a secure method. Probably I'm still missing some bits and pieces.
Apparently it's Naomi's video with Pacia that enlightened me. I now have a clearer picture of what Avalanche is and how it works.
If Avalanche can be applied to BCH, that would be awesome. However, I have to be honest I have yet to understand how this is a secure method. Probably I'm still missing some bits and pieces.
Thank you! Have some too!
I'm not pro Facebook, but this is a good idea.
Ah, that explains. Got it, thanks!
And the jump on the audio level is more noticable if there's an ad playing before your video starts. Or if I went to watch, let's say, a TED video afterwards.
The thing is I'm mostly on bone conduction headphones and they tend to need extra volume, even with regular videos. On the animated emoji ones, I ran out of volume knob range. 😅
Hey Naomi, I'm loving your animated emoji videos! They're a treat! However, and not that I want to sound like Mr. Sound Man, but the audio level is below that of your regular ones.
And the jump on the audio level is more noticable if there's an ad playing before your video starts. Or if I went to watch, let's say, a TED video afterwards.
Judge threatens to hold Craig Wright in criminal contempt
Hey Naomi, I'm loving your animated emoji videos! They're a treat! However, and not that I want to sound like Mr. Sound Man, but the audio level is below that of your regular ones.
Thanks for the suggestions!
We, or at least I, would get warm fuzzy feelings and really appreciate it if you can let us know you're seeing these periodically, such as with this message you just wrote. Thank you!
