Nobody has more conspiracy theories than you. What happened to that "SECRET" chain NCHAIN was building? It was the only possible theory. LMAO
It's still there. ABC wouldn't be checkpointing if they weren't afraid of it.
Better have SV that wants legal global business usage than abc that wants PoS, checkpoints, bucket shops and pseudo anarchy coin that will be marginalized.
IDK, it seems like they wouldn't spend so much energy sabotaging the code if they didn't understand it. These astroturfing campaigns are pretty heavy.
They let Core win. They really don’t know what they are doing. What is common knowledge for us eludes them. But I’m happy they don’t get it. Let’s me load up on SV.
Lock the protocol have no chance to win, even BTC core is seeking ways to upgrade, they choose Segwit, BCH choose big block, SV choose to lock itself.
Why do you say "Lock the protocol have no chance to win"? Internet protocol has been locked now for 30 years.
Seems mighty unlikely since SV will have to reorg 685 (557452-556767) blocks since ABC's checkpoint checkpoint
Everyone seems to think they have to reorg the whole chain. Why do people think that? Reorg like 10 blocks (repeatedly?), and already you have done much damage. Miners miss rewards etc
SV is bleeding more money than BCH.
No way man. Look at the hashrates, the profitability for BTC is way higher right now, esp yesterday when SV's dropped to 1.1 Exa. ABC is using pools to fund this - they pay cust in BTC
I rather think we just prevented it by not letting SV being the majority chain.
Aren't we using SV by default on here?
i am realizing something... BSV is same as BCH and 1/4 of the value. And open to 128 mb scale ... maybe we will see something surprise here. Money Button is already on the BSV side. Hash power is now more on BSV...
so you have two seperate chains, couldn't you take a block before their checkpoint and just work from there to re-org, and skip the blocks that have new rules with the protections?
Basically the txns between the checkpoint and when the re-org chain emerges will be frozen in time until ABC can pump their minority chain back to life. It will be a total cfusterfulk.
I rather think we just prevented it by not letting SV being the majority chain.
ABC - Another blockstream company.
i am realizing something... BSV is same as BCH and 1/4 of the value. And open to 128 mb scale ... maybe we will see something surprise here. Money Button is already on the BSV side. Hash power is now more on BSV...
BSV also has block explorers now. I built one www.svblox.com and there are some others like bsvexplorer.info
How to make business decisions in a world that is changing
@_opreturn
Then, you have to follow how titles of posts gradually changed.
Finally, you have to watch the video again.
Then you will know the lie made out of what Ryan said.
Ryan didn't say anything about getting sued as a direct threat from SV, he mentioned the cost of doing business on the ABC chain and working against patents held by nChain.
Also he has promoted it a lot
Roger was legit once upon a time. But has since been compromised.
Roger was legit once upon a time. But has since been compromised.
He is just misguided. Perhaps by his own mind. Perhaps by Jihan, who knows.
Lol I'm having dejavu from late 2016.
https://goo.gl/images/yVMU1H
He's unhinged! Pathological liar! All his support is astroturfed!
Maybe I'm not following enough people on Twitter (about a 1000) but I don't see unrefuted arguments for ABC there.
My conclusion is BMG pool had superior performance during stress test. How do I join the BMG pool? (Sorry Bitcoin.com, it’s only business)
We dont need CTOR for 1gb blocks...
everyone who uses `Faketoshi` needs to read this -
https://archive.fo/kjuLi ...it would be dumb for CSW to actually prove that he is Satoshi; it's enough that Ross Ulbricht is in prison
There will be no BCH with SV. I believe his intent is to destroy BCH entirely. His SV client and manufactured dissent is just a cover story for a 51% attack on BCH.
ABC is the biggest threat to BTC - with ABC's upgrade BCH will make BTC look like a sad joke.
since SV was caught unprepared to ABC and didn't provide any serious upgrade proposal.
SV did. Leaving damaging opcodes out is an upgrade compared to letting them in.
Yes, and they will get that with ABC along with the neccesseary optimizations to achieve gigabyte blocks. SV offers no concrete info on how they will fix the bottlenecks.
Ok so you have that info right in your link. Businesses need a clear pathway to higher blocksizes. 128Mb is kind of small but it may do for now. At least showing some progress.
How do you think those businesses will react when the blocks start crapping out anytime they reach 22mb? Bad experience=bad business. Issues need to be resolved while there is less tx.
No such thing.
What is the thinking behind the character limit in #memo? Wouldn't the BCH cost keep posts short without this?
This is a limit in the size of OP_RETURN transaction outputs. Longer messages would require multiple transactions which we haven't added support for yet. Thanks for your question.
