This one blows my mind! This climbing plant can literally mimic the leaves of its supporting tree. V is climbing plant, T is supporting tree.
Most racist/homophobic/nationalistic problems have one common educational/scientific source: People don't understand statistical randomness, normal distribution and evolutionary theory.
Robert Liston was a competent surgeon who could amputate a leg in two minutes. However one day he achieved the impossible. With a single surgery he had a 300% mortality rate.How is this possible?
Sadly, no. You can still initiate a request to login, and not complete it, to consume server resources. Repeat as fast as needed to consume all resources on the server.
How about:
Distributing a tx with a fee and your ip address (in OP_RETURN). Then the server whitelists this ip for x hours? Could this work?
Iron lung. The first mechanical ventilator. It's function is closer to the physiology campared to the modern machines.
Could this be a solution to ddos attacks? Requiring a Satoshi to login would make ddos attacks pretty expensive.
For more photos search "baby cage"
Dr. Luther Emmett Holt's theory about "airing" children (1894) taken to the extreme (photo 1934)
Resistent bacteria loose their resistance genes once you remove the antibiotic.
So what I meant is we filter out real noise.
It seems you're more into the theme, let me know what you think.
Circumstances that could be critical for your survival. But a feature that is not used becomes a bug in evolutionary terms.
Resistent bacteria loose their resistance genes once you remove the antibiotic.
So what I meant is we filter out real noise.
Imagine we could see beyond our visible spectrum. γ waves, radiowaves, everything. Would it be good,or would it just distract you? Of course we can find circumstances where it is good
Circumstances that could be critical for your survival. But a feature that is not used becomes a bug in evolutionary terms.
I agree with your whole memo storm. But I would set it differently: Evolution filters out noise. Noise that is real but most of the time useless.
Imagine we could see beyond our visible spectrum. γ waves, radiowaves, everything. Would it be good,or would it just distract you? Of course we can find circumstances where it is good
This talk boils down to we *might* not perceive reality accurately & I have no suggestion for how reality actually is.
I agree with your whole memo storm. But I would set it differently: Evolution filters out noise. Noise that is real but most of the time useless.
In the model he presents, there are cases where agents knowing more about reality drive to extinction those that know less. Depends on the cost of information.
...will you be more competitive in natural selection if X? seems like this can depend on lots of things
Not true. An accurate representation of reality districts you from things that matter. So it's against survival.
disagree, ex, getting an more accurate representation of reality means better survival. (eg that woman who tried to 'photosynthesize' instead of eating.)
Not true. An accurate representation of reality districts you from things that matter. So it's against survival.
Hacked.com is a trading/ crypto oriented website.
Sadly they wish some kind of subscription.
Use Google cache to bypass it.
Same with buisnessinsider.com
I meant Businessinsider.com
Hacked.com is a trading/ crypto oriented website.
Sadly they wish some kind of subscription.
Use Google cache to bypass it.
Same with buisnessinsider.com
I am out of the loop, what is the racist outbreak? Our ancestors even interbreed with the Neanderthals, which is arguably another species or subspecies, true inter-species romance.
I mean the skin colour discriminations. The main biological reason we have different skin colours is vit D synthesis, wich actually should not lead to discriminations.
