There’s not enough real live empirical data evaluation of hardware and software with high volume of txns. Too much theoretical arguments on limitations
a couple of other things to worry about ATM
you mean c5 - h5? If so, that's the incorrect answer lol
i mean that it seems i can reply with that and your queen is dead . . .
at this point i castled thinking i had a phantom knight protecting that bishop. sorry!! shall we take it up from here? it would make the most sense. e5 - d6
at this point i castled thinking i had a phantom knight protecting that bishop. sorry!! shall we take it up from here? it would make the most sense. e5 - d6
TIME OUT, I replayed from the beginning and that knight is definitely dead. We can play out both boards if you want. Np either way
yes there is a mistake!! i come out of that xchange losing. i'll take the fall and post again. BTW i am away from my board using this
https://lichess.org/editor
I'm gonna do it. We're going to learn the answer to the question 'how rare is a western chessboard in Tokyo'.
pls report
so close to a palindrome . . .
Still getting the kinks out. This was the board position I was looking at https://imgur.com/gallery/QwRFqoS
go analog
If ABC nodes have high chance to go offline during stresstest, Jihan will not support. Since SV is a copy, o doubt CSW would as well. Unless their hardware is far more superior..
It’s not over yet. BitcoinSV miners have enough hashpower to rewrite the ABC chain all the while maintaining hashpower to protect BitcoinSV.
unless hash moves over from BTC. which is also a goal.
I think listening to diverse opinions is useful, but some people swamp the feed. It would be great just to see occasional msg from them to see what they're currently on about.
yep . . . i'm sure you don't need to know about my chess game . . . on the other hand that is a contrived use case.
