"One meg good, two megs bad!"
Is there a cost calculator anywhere? 1984 should be next!
Is my mental schematic correct, or am I missing something.
Yep exactly. I'm not a cryptographer though but it makes sense, in my mind anyway, that such a setup would be stronger
Ah, we use the same key-pair to send and receive, it would be better if we used one key-pair to send and one key-pair to receive.
Yes, exactly.
No, you misread. The complexity increases when a user only sends from one key pair and receives with another. This makes it more difficult for snoopers.
Ah, we use the same key-pair to send and receive, it would be better if we used one key-pair to send and one key-pair to receive.
So the increase in complexity from dual key pairs makes it easier for outsiders to analyse it, less complexity would be better(?)?
No, you misread. The complexity increases when a user only sends from one key pair and receives with another. This makes it more difficult for snoopers.
Yes. However a problem remains in this system; The more messages you send the easier cryptanalysis becomes. Complexity increases with dual key pairs: SendToPubKey, ReceiveFromPubKey.
Having said this, it is certainly possible that AES was broken years ago.
Learning something new every day, I take it that was why you recommended using keys not stored on memo.cash as one password stolen compromises all communication both ways.
Yes. However a problem remains in this system; The more messages you send the easier cryptanalysis becomes. Complexity increases with dual key pairs: SendToPubKey, ReceiveFromPubKey.
https://memcrypt.cash pubkey: 022952F74E7A53DE7D41EC70E26EB80F1034DE35CC0BBD27FCF101FC5DF12611E5
Bo61N3S!%
#eE_di&Z;(>yao=W?~E~!a)$dzySMF^Z${R2Y660K7;UUwPEVp&?Xd)%S2nY{,,f%svMiY$MB1n2vTOI6K1.mviHh3n_u)T9dGog|k)NKl7>GR&zv7Eez2)LHF7}I9}T?"E1eT#pb})su^U,fsD&z1oHh5_T1!}<NkfDfjpp`,0YIFmH8PW31=SI>SRpTA
I mean respect in the sense of obedience, not as in an admiration or condoning. Obedience would probably be a better word, common usage to say respect when meaning obedience.
"Obedience" earns zero respect.
"Respect" as a replacement for obey/comply/submit/etc is an old linguistic sham used by thugs to justify situational authority.
1/2 see the link->
Better the little that the righteous have
than the wealth of many wicked;
for the power of the wicked will be broken,
but the Lord upholds the righteous.
Psalm 37:16–17
Super secret spy shit lol 😂 I'll have my martini shaken fused with strawberries on ice put through a blender in a submarine going over the Niagara falls please 🍸 Nice tutorial
Yes exactly, in fact we could already do it using our memo keys as you can find my public key onchain and I can find yours likewise. It's just not advisable cos of password security
I see, anyone that has their public key (generated from their private) will be able to receive messages from anyone that wants to send them over the chain.
I'm going to bed, no public key from me. Although I did post one a while ago in this thread so have at it.
Yes the last two messages are precisely it. Not the one before that though.
Then if you post your own public key, I could encrypt a message to that which you could decrypt using both my own public key and your own private key
So for example, if I wanted to share something private with you. I'd go to my offline pc, generate a private key then take it's associated public key, post it here...
No. You share the public key of your offline generated private key. You can get the 66 char hex public key by inputting the private key to bitaddress.org->wallet details
An easy addition to that tool would be a scanner that checked every encrypted message for something sent to you. The only thing that's missing is the tying of a public key 2 account
Well, otherwise we'd have to type it in for every action. Thankfully, nobodies stupid enough to have more than a few dollars in their account (if that). Clean your toilet lol
With my memo key pair (everyone can find my memo public key on the blockchain, and everyone can find yours too). But memo stores your password in browser cache in plaintext
Without my public key you mean no doubt? No. And I'd also need your public key too. I could encrypt something to your memo public key but that is not good opsec.
