No, we want bitcoin that is unbounded, that scales, that can be stable base for the real crypto revolution. Why do you even care about SV at this point? Go BCHing somewhere else :p
No more splits means BSV will do well. Three camps: BTC small blocks, no HF; BCH medium blocks, experimental protocol 6 mo HFs; BSV stable protocol, massive blocks.
and a 100MB block as a birthday gift ;)
Other coins either are anti state, anti law, anti scale or anti people - scams. Without working within law there wont be state adoption. Without scale there wont be corp.adoption
Bsv will succeed because of the economics behind it and working within existing laws. It benefits companies, honest states and people. Its win win win.
Obviously Roz. Im just pointing out Sams lack of logic and IQ. Its a common theme in anti-SV'ers that needs to be called out publicly.
Avalanche aka proof of stake pre consensus junk? It seems like good idea but it isnt. Ask Ryan today what he thinks about it.
CSW is major part of Satoshi group. (Incl Dave Kleiman). Only retards dont see it and noone cares if they dont see that. In the end, its their loss.
Avalanche seems like a great idea the more I hear about it. Helos scaling, and protection against double spends.
Great idea for a centrally planed miners uncompetitive socialist coin.
just wants to fulfill "Satoshi's Vision" (taking ownership of the brand),and just another step in a strategy devised years ago which is trying to make hardforking away of BS impossible
No it has some issues. It changes the "incentives of bitcoin", it changes how bitcoin works, it's not necessary, and some others things
Amaury explains it better and simpler:"Basically, it is like Ripple" RIP
Do you have a source for that?
Let's wait and see. What if they do mine 128 or 512 next year? That it was fake? It doesnt count? Just curious.
This can be said about 99% of coins... including btc and bch.
Wondering if bitmain is pumping before q4 ends?
Seems everyone on ABC side forgot that we all wanted to have Bitcoin used by EVERYONE, that includes governments also, and that we want to scale on-chain only and not have shitcoins, etc.
There are to many idiots that don't understand the bitcoin whitepaper and what it offers. This is why we have shitcoins and stupid changes forced into protocol. BSV needs to win.
You have thigs exactly backwards. NChain attempted a blockstream like takeover. Mass censoring, astroturfing, and hating all other coin.
Who is then censoring BSV point of view on r/BTC and hates CSW? isn't it happening? BTW there can be only ONE coin, only with one it really makes sense.
Either you are bitcoin maximalist or a shitcoiner. There is no reason to have more than one global coin. If you support more, you are against crypto.
Wow. #BSV #BitcoinSV = #Bitcoin
ABC wanted the split to take place. Amaury belived investors win either way. Doesn't feel like winning now, huh? Question now is who can be unprofitable longer before going bust.
To me, BCH no longer exists. It’s BAB or BSV. BCH merchants will have to chose. Will be silly to see BitPay & Purse.io continue to support BAB as it’s price and hashpower plummet
BitPay and Purse.io are the only things i miss on BSV. Fortunately all the rest, including great devs migrated to BSV.
In the case that Memo only supports one chain, which chain do you prefer?
BSV definitely
If avalanche is soft-fork, can the pre-consensus pow be replaced with pos also as a soft fork?
PoS pre-consensus, really? is this still bitcoin?...
The percentage of age difference between my father and I fell as well. Does that mean I'm aging faster than he is?
Depends what is the expected and actual % change. Maybe your father is in a rocket travelling with near-light speed?
