Are there any references you could link which would explain these recurring pattern analysis with the ABCs and the numbers (Fibonacci)?
https://www.tradingview.com/x/ArqsSUGR If it hits both boxes(see the fib levels it hits between?) you're in business. Bat entry is lower than a Gartley.
not spendable -- a Chinese miner may validate their tx if he wishes but with no one to care for the on-chain transaction since the clients everyone will use will only honor the Liquid
service on top, and with the help of the state who will see absolutely no problem with a cryptocurrency it can control and regulate through gateskeeper it'll be back to square one.
"All the Bitcoin leaders have now told people to just use Banking, Fiat, and Credit Cards. Its tempting to assume they've been bought off by Banks. More likely they're just grossly unqualified to be running the
Bitcoin project. Having the best cryptographers in the world doesn’t mean they’re qualified to be building a new financial system for the world."
Anywhere else (to the right) and there is no ratio. BTW, I still cant find a definite answer - ratios must be as exact as possible or can be between 1.27-1.618 on bullish butterfly
Forget exact as possible, you're trading a highly leveraged asset that's volatile across multiple exchanges. With these tiny swings you can only go by ranges and probabilities.
UN UNCED Earth Summit 1992 "I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process. That would take too long and devour far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder..."
This link mentions "between 1.618% – 2.618" another doc I was reading says it's either 1.618 or 2.618 and not "something in between". 1.618;2.618 is not the same as 1.68-2.618
This would've been a valid Gartley but it invalidated. https://www.tradingview.com/x/iFdUL9io Notice how much volume it needed to get past the horizontal resistance @553
What would be the point of censoring a transaction though? Also if you held EOS and they were stolen but you were able to get them back through EOS911 wouldn’t you be grateful?
I definately would but I wouldn't be grateful if the government ordered my money to be confiscated
Why are people still believing in books written by the intention to control and manipulate the masses? Your own senses and logical thinking are the only way to receive the truth.
The perenity of your society depends on those who procreate. If its members can't procreate it's definitely an handicap for the society. I'm not sure why your trying to argue that.
Procreate - and then have that offspring be competent enough to carry the torch for another generation. To my knowledge it's never been done without a solid nuclear family foundation.
In-Q-Tel. As the developer who found the bug pointed out: what better way to kill Bitcoin than introduce an inflation bug? And what better way to do than creating 2 different code
changes that by themselves do nothing bad, but when combined with other innocent looking “refactoring” spells disaster?
"The irony that at the same time all the Core fanboys we're proudly walking around wearing Assert(0) tshirts to mock a BU crashing bug, their own production code had a bug in it that allowed for unbounded inflation."
You think it's their dream job? Wage slaves. Stuck with a shitty job they cant quit or end up on the street. Bezos PR stunt, few zillion for the poor but no better pay for employees.