Yesterday 310061-309765=296 memo transactions. Number of transactions📈1.0%|abc(310050-309754=296,📈1.0%),sv(699396-699218=178,📈36.9%)
Looks like BCH is pulling away. Any idea why?
Year 2019 will be the year of bottom forming
Seems likely, if history repeats itself
CSW is major part of Satoshi group. (Incl Dave Kleiman). Only retards dont see it and noone cares if they dont see that. In the end, its their loss.
How does a common person lose by not believing CSW was part of the Satoshi Group?
Yesterday 305823-305515=308 memo transactions. Number of transactions📉26.1%|abc(305812-305504=308,📉26.1%),sv(696517-612806=83711,📈2564.3%)
Hopefully users come back!
Very sad that the content went to garbage... a real loss to the community
I am Jihan. Hello Memo!
Welcome, Jihan!
We have never quite achieved
#moralcapitalism, but we have been close. It's a worthy goal.
#Evilsocialism, on the other hand, has happened many times.
Yesterday 295025-294479=546 memo transactions. Number of transactions📉3.4%|abc(295012,546,📉2.8%),sv(294592,412,📉18.6%)
I like the inclusion of new data, but the format is kinda hard to read
#Moralcapitalism incentivises hard work, savings, improving the world, and giving future generations a better life and chance of success.
#Moralcapitalism helps the poor by reducing cost of goods, improving choice and access, and improving quality of products WITHOUT violating property rights.
Jihan was right. Looks like BTC going under 5000. Wow. The whole market is taking a dump.
Link? What did he say and when?
It seems companies and miners are starting to take sides... which do you all support?
What is Memo's approach to the hard fork?
LightRider, what's your goal in posting here? And do you think insulting people is the way to achieve it?
Justice is not fairness, it's a process and a goal of trying to right moral wrongs that have occurred. Justice as Fairness is a non-sequiter.
And who gets to decide what the definition of "unlimited wealth" is? What gives them that right?
Not everyone lets fear drive their decisions. People strive for a better life, especially for their kids. People want to be able to take risks and be rewarded.
I mean, not everyone is risk averse. Not everyone in the Original Position would have to have the same values. People (even in the original position) aren't necessarily of identical mindset.
Can someone educated in philosophy explain how Rawl's Original Position couldn't also result in The Golden Rule in combination with the Non-Aggression Principle? Why Justice as Fairness?
The fact that you continue to post non fucking stop shows the level of your delusion
LightRider, you are so salty that Capitalism has helped more people than any other system in history. You have been blinded to think it is responsible for the atrocities of socialism.
A new whole level, banned for talking about BCH: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9cehj1/banned_from_rcc_for_talking_about_the_bitcoin_bch/?st=jlldkqyt&sh=be5db4e0
Socialism is based on envy and jealously
Shitposting to the moon!!
Would love to see To The Moon Guy here
