Personal attacks are offenses to attack the credibility of the speaker. Everyone has the right to discuss, but so too do we have the right to tell you that you are unqualified to participate.
You can either sit in your low income home in Texas and rage against a system you have no control or power over, or you can get up and do literally anything that forwards your agenda.
I mean, that's what it means when the opposing side refuses to speak to you right? That you won? That your argument is superior? Definitely couldn't mean anything else...
The world is changed forever as the true workers and laborers of the world build a peaceful Utopia devoid of all greed and go on to colonize the universe in peace.
Alas we lay defeated. I breathe my dying dirty capitalist breath in a ditch as the bourgeoisie and the workers take back what I stole and brutality exploited them for. Blast you Frank, you won!
When and if LightRider posts a complete layout of a socialist society including law, distribution of resources etc. I'll read it and hear him out. But only when all the essential details are present.
That's one of the many problems with LightRider and his ramblings. Everything is "socialism could work", "socialism should work". I can even hear him now: "Capitalism doesn't work, it's shown that!"
People like LightRider don't deserve to be spoken to, or paid any attention. When you drop out of college three times, have no job and contribute nothing to no one capitalist or otherwise, you have no influence.
Without the presence of symbol or color, a black man and a white man can identify and hate one another. That is the power we are seeing displayed online every day.
Today, the answer is becoming more and more yes. Because on top of these symbols and colors, we build identities on top of them. Identies that allow violent groups to recognize each other.
The more differences we can create, the more chaos ensues and the deeper a grasp entropy has on civilization until it all comes crashing down to it's natural state of disorder.