There’s not enough real live empirical data evaluation of hardware and software with high volume of txns. Too much theoretical arguments on limitations
Let's see what kind of "argument" they will come up with now, that 128 MB or bigger are not needed yet. I can remember those small blocker comments quite good from last year.
Jeffrey their "attack" is breaking BCH free from ABC (Blockstream) like last year's August. You're bringing the same arguments that the core shills brought up.
Nothing on there addresses the bottlenecks we saw during the last few stress tests. Why bump up block size to 128 MB (or at all) when it's clear we can't safely make 32 MB blocks yet?
Your argument dismantles itself, because then you could say we definitely don't need CTOR because it's just premature optimization not needed yet.
If this sentence... "And users will decide which coin they will call Bitcoin." If it had said Bitcoin Cash, I would have been fooled. Ironically, I ultimately agree with the reasoning.
This is the kind of development that makes BCH valuable. Meanwhile, in BTC...
Meanwhile in btc everyone is too busy circle jerking to a lambo meme to develop anything of actual use. I wonder if Samson Mow will be the one eating the cracker in the end 🤢 lol
BitcoinSV nodes are increasing rapidly up to 49 nodes today. For CSW haters, can you explain this to me? I have visited and read the entire site and found all arguments very respectable.