Yeah right. That's what was supposed to happen with BCH. If any explode in the next few months it will be BCH because it is way ahead towards adoption.
The only thing that will happen to BCH is choking on it's own checkpoints.
The main difference is that ABC will be ETH 2.0 and BSV will be capable of 1 TB blocks in the near future. Also ABC gets driven by people out for profit instead of creating a world currency
You still don't get that you can use graphene without CTOR don't you? CTOR is the most useless premature micro optimization that is currently out there.
You mean users gonna use. People in support of Bitcoin SV were the majority of people actually using Bitcoin, while BABies kept using only reddit and censorship.
Bitcoin SV is the true Bitcoin, BAB coin is just Bitcoin Cash and not Bitcoin as Jihan has said who only mines small blocks and mines with their customer's hardware.
Let's see what kind of "argument" they will come up with now, that 128 MB or bigger are not needed yet. I can remember those small blocker comments quite good from last year.
Jeffrey their "attack" is breaking BCH free from ABC (Blockstream) like last year's August. You're bringing the same arguments that the core shills brought up.
Nothing on there addresses the bottlenecks we saw during the last few stress tests. Why bump up block size to 128 MB (or at all) when it's clear we can't safely make 32 MB blocks yet?
Your argument dismantles itself, because then you could say we definitely don't need CTOR because it's just premature optimization not needed yet.
If you eat meat like twice a week and else have a really balanced diet it's way more healthy in my opinion. The main reason for all the diseases are junk food, smoking and alcohol.