It is no problem for others if some people want others to handle the security.
Then why would they want crypto currencies in the first place? They will just have no benefit of them. They will go down with the banks or banks will win and crypto currencies go down.
for two things: delegation of responsibility (those who want other people to handle the security) and for loans.
That's the whole point of a p2p currency to have full control for yourself. And loans can be achieved in other ways like crowdfunding. Cryptocurrencies will fuck up banks!
Bitcoin is not against banking. It is against a central issuing authority over the monetary system.
Banking on the original protocol will benefit everyone.
Banking on Liquid/Lightning is just federal reserve 2.0
I don't agree with that, why would you still need banks when having a p2p electronic currency?
It was just based on the 11.5 BCH / 24h limit we aimed for this stresstest, so half an hour is just 1/48 of that 11.5 BCH to have the same intensity of transactions per second.
The only thing that makes Bitcoin Cash different from all the other thousands of crypto currencies is it's highly likly prospects of being used as a global currency.
If you don't support or appreciate that, you just make Bitcoin Cash the same thing as every other crypto currency already available and render it's purpose and prospects useless.
If you just want and think to get rich because you see the low price of Bitcoin Cash and the chance to acquire more coins without using it in any way then you might as well not support it at all.
The only thing that makes Bitcoin Cash different from all the other thousands of crypto currencies is it's highly likly prospects of being used as a global currency.
If you just want and think to get rich because you see the low price of Bitcoin Cash and the chance to acquire more coins without using it in any way then you might as well not support it at all.