I suppose it oughta be my turn sometime.
Does Electron Cash SLP create its own separate wallet dir, i.e. not re-use ~/.electron-cash ?
Guess I should back up anyway :-D
No. It uses the same dir, but I think it will complain of you try to open a non-SLP wallet.
Monday Memo!
When writing code, you should comment it regularly, particularly functions and any lines whose meaning isn't obvious. That way your code can be understood later on and doesn't become write-only.
Good requirements help here. Also requirements should be the basis of your test cases.
I'm fine with people working on the known bottlenecks as long as the moral hazard of having the limit is not manifest as it became with Core.
I think BCH community would see to this.
I think this is a big positive that I didn't see before.
Not sure but think my 1st message in the last thread got lost. I was against dynamic block limits but I'm starting to warm to it. My initial thought was, we test the network and set the limit at the 1st bottleneck...
IMO the biggest mistake LTC has made:
To replicate the same settlement system/payment system split BTC introduced, by following the exact same scaling strategy.
- block size cap + RBF + Segwit
- LN to scale payments
LTC was the original copy cat. And it only became a BTC testnet.
I don't have a twitter account. Would someone with a twitter account mind posting my SLP address to that twitter thread?
simpleledger:qzatnm3rmalulck3d8aqy5su8n7jkd2djspdsm46je