makes sense to make it explicit but to my eyes this come bundle w/ blacklisting. You basically introduce a precedent and remove plausible deniability when it will be most needed.
Agreed on both main points you made. Blacklisting would be near impossible to implement *and* it introduces a new validation criteria as IFP proposal would have had.
BUIP143 may have had an effect in helping IFP proponents to re-evaluate, thou
Agreed on both main points you made. Blacklisting would be near impossible to implement *and* it introduces a new validation criteria as IFP proposal would have had.
620482efa2d218a7405314f71417101661ceb031d9885cdfb0f68b8a32234b70
c2df3732bbe0f6381546bf7231326647604f00ba7a20f3f18ce9c1ceee6f8f40
Awesome. BCH developers should get custom tags on
#Memo - also, thank you for all your hard work. I'm running a BU Cash node right now.
sickpig, as in BU sickpig?
yep
5081f3cb4b5f88419f208648e58a707f0561f24901d97a8c60a19a03c5f82909
a98d420d7df73dc645a89965a5b7bf6654182e926d25368f5d631419db50d49d
117a54c240764f4d6d5f4f4f5aad4d316bb223d8662b6868d14828d86004873d
a98d420d7df73dc645a89965a5b7bf6654182e926d25368f5d631419db50d49d
Do you like polls?
| Yes |
124 votes
· 16,356 satoshis
|
| No |
7 votes
· 1,000 satoshis
|
Results
Creating...
Broadcasting...
Hi Memo, sickpig's speaking. Glad to be here.
