it would be stupid to taunt the SEC; crypto wins when government adopts it & is forced to play by the same transparent Bitcoin rules as you do
So you would be against adding privacy features to BCH because it would mean that governments would be able to use them as well, therefore not helping with transparency?
In other words, does the main website show only messages that exist on both chains? Or on either?
I'm wondering, if I run out of unsplit coins, and charge my wallet with coins only on the bch(abc) side, and disable the split protection in order to be able to use them, will my msgs be seen here?
So they would calculate more than 2.2MB of ordering info in the VISA example I gave above.
The mention n*log2(n) bits of info for ordering n transactions. This is the same as log2(n^n). I believe that's an overestimate, I think that you need log2(n!) which is always lower.
I'm not an expert or anything so it would be great if someone could doublecheck me btw. :-) Also I noticed that the Graphene whitepaper mentions a formula which would give even higher numbers.
So for VISA level of txs per second (1000200txs/block), CTOR will cut down about 2.2MB of ordering info from graphene if I get this right.
bytes! not bits, sorry. 2.5 bytes.
Nah I think I'm right. If you have about 1mil txs in a block, each extra tx will be adding 2.5bits of info to graphene.So the ordering info is quite linear in the block sizes that we have now.
Or maybe I have some mistake in my calculations. I'll double check later.
On the other hand, I'm not sure if those ordering bits will be a problem ever. In order for a tx to add 250bytes of ordering info to graphene, we need 2^2000 txs in a block.
The less causality chains there will be in a block between txs, since more people use the system. Which works against TTOR.
these bits then. Although to be completely fair, TTOR (the previous ordering) does not allow ANY ordering so ideally it wouldn't transmit all of those bits either. But the bigger the adoption
10 bits of info. Going to 11 txs and you need 26bits of info. 16txs->45bits. 21txs->66bits. 31txs->113bits. 36txs->138bits. You add more and more bits for every tx you add. CTOR gets rid of
Please correct me if I am wrong. To get an idea: If you have 1 tx in a block, then 0 bits of information are needed for the ordering since there is only one tx. Going to 6 txs and you need
Actually it should scale by the logarithm of the factorial now that I think about it.
And the combination of Graphene and CTOR gets rid of that fast growing chunk of information when it comes to network traffic.
It does, and the bigger the blocks, the bigger the relative improvement on graphene. As the blocks scale, the size of the ordering info scales as the factorial of the number of txs.
kind of makes sense, but why is BTC not yet banned from being on exchanges? it was running the Silk Road
.. in BSV) for illegal purposes. That's the most sane solution. Both it and banning the whole platform are pointless of course, as the war on drugs has shown. People always find ways.
kind of makes sense, but why is BTC not yet banned from being on exchanges? it was running the Silk Road
Actually what is said is not 100% true. They could and maybe would avoid banning the platform and instead try to go after individuals that use DSV (or it's script implementation ..
kind of makes sense, but why is BTC not yet banned from being on exchanges? it was running the Silk Road
In the SR case I guess they wanted to go after the website. This won't be the case if the functionality is on the platform though. Then either the try to ban the whole thing or nothng.
Do you think Half-Life 3 is ever coming out?
| Yes |
0 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
| No |
0 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
| Taxation is theft |
0 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
Creating...
Broadcasting...
hmm DSV TXs can be shut down like this as well ...could the platform be partially liable in DSV scenario & not in the tx-script/tx-flow case?
.. And banning a command in a programming language will be a first and would probably be a precedent they don't want to set. They would simply ban the platform if anything at all.
