transaction? 3) Finally, coins can never be joined back together in larger pieces?
Does this mean the avg. transaction size will continue to grow as smaller and smaller coins are used to complete txns?
great thanks, that makes more sense. so if I use a 10 BCH input & 3 BCH input to make one 13 BCH output that 13 BCH is one input for the next txn?
Lots of new developments in BCH, thats so awesome.
![]()
If someone says "bcash" start calling the high-fee settlement layer "bcore"
I just assume really smart people are working on these issues (bc it would break a lot more than BCH). dont have any thoughts of my own on the topic
Sitting right at 0.05 on the ratio. I think we are going to rip BTC a new asshole after this consolidation. The 1 month BCH/BTC charts show a nice round bottom.
Odd, mempool on my BU node went from 16MB to 1MB, but a block that size was never mined. Johoe's mempool shows the same.
Regarding mempool, I read that it's cuz there was a large invalid transaction in the mempool so that didn't get mined.
& bc of the first seen rule it hung up everything else?
I believe a developer is taking all the attackers transaction outputs for himself. The idiot attacker could only attack with an anyone-can-spend transaction so they're all up for grabs.
![]()
don't your developers test before changes? lol
Dump your shitcoin fellas. Its official. LOOLOLOLOLOLLOLLLLOLOL.
