Wrong and unrelated as Aumary fucked off biggest BCH miners to that point already in August.
Changing goal posts. You're trying really hard, but failing just as fast.
You said you get a ton of likes for correcting me and also I only got likes from you. Math must be as hard as paraphrasing for you! Also connecting the dots. You like it simple. Gotcha
It was all good, but then you mentioned you get more likes and now..... I dunno. I will probably go to see some CSW videos to cheer myself up.
Oh... he mentions shitcoins on every interview and brags how he holds many of them. He likes DASH in particularly.
My life is so miserable... I wish I received more likes. ☹️😩
LOL that's not paraphrasing at all, "node" is even shorter than "miner" jackass. Please keep talking, you're doing an excellent job of discrediting yourself for me
OMG... paraphrasing has nothing to do with shortening. It's the meaning dude. "I am small and can't compete, big guys bad, big guys centraliseeeed!!"
"It's easy because of the pixels" lol. You're spouting bullshit mate, admit it.
No, that would be you. One example, Coingeek had around 1.000PH for 6 months and before fork they brought another 1.000PH, right now they use 250PH on BSV.
Point still stands: "If you really cared about miners then you would be on BTC."
It must be hard to live with that much cognitive dissonance.
BTC miners are as disengaged when coming to decision making as they can possibly be. Whooosh...
More bullshit nonsense from a #Faketoshi zealot.
If you really cared about miners then you would be on BTC.
Amaury "investor win" Sechet fucked off major miners and initiated split. Now BCH is run by wannabe protocol devs and BSV by miners.
You just gave me purpose. I might keep them now. 🤪
That's the idea.
More bullshit nonsense from a #Faketoshi zealot.
If you really cared about miners then you would be on BTC.
Miners mine what is profitable. They care not to suck a chain dry on the short term. But their investments are aligned with long term sustainability of the network.
You just said that BCH's roadmap was to "accept the Bitcoin protocol", are you saying that BCH accepts its own protocol if you aren't talking about BTC? Because that's a given, nutso
Maybe in your world BTC is still bitcoin. But in mine, it lost too much of original design to still be called bitcoin. Hence if it wouldn't there would be no need for BCH/BSV forks.
I rather see miners dictated roadmap than zero stake Aumary type of devs... we split "investor win" type of guys.
The ideologues made me move away from it as well though, if you strip away the scapegoats and bullshit marketing, CSW doesn't really have anything to sell. Plus that Centralized Calvin
You sound like core 2.0. It's just 2017 all over again.
I'll trade you BSV for your remaining BCH 1:1 if it means that you'll stop shitposting here, I'd happily make that investment to have you babbling on the loony blockchain you belong on
You just gave me purpose. I might keep them now. 🤪
Not without further protocol changes like reducing block time.
One can not declare that BSV has the best implementation. Especially since it is weaker on the one issue it prides itself on, which is scaling, and being a usable currency.
I’m declaring BSV
#1. I can’t even text a decent size message because ABC is still locked at 200 characters. BSV is 65,000. What a shit Bitcoin BTC and BCH are
It seems like wormhole was a cheap attempt to compete with ETH and Gabriel is nr1 zelout for ETH as he stated numerous times. He also forked metamask and made badger.
That would only prolong his rule as he would rig elections again.
It's hard to understand competition and capitalism I know. In BCH I guess every raspberry needs to be consulted of approval.
Retweet/Rememo would be a welcoming addition to memo.
