The SV chain is like a retard magnet.
I almost love that about it, BSV drew all the crazy ideologues away from BCH while still showing us that Bitcoin can scale without LN, and what a real centralized blockchain looks like
You keep saying jobless so much, that I'm not sure if you understand anything about open source development. Do you even code?
Open source means nothing in this context. A bunch of corporate software is releasing open source software.
You better ignore the turd, he sure steers adoption. This is the downside of the platform. It refuses to implement block :(
More video evidence collected
This what I dislike the most in the authoritarian #CultOfCraig. You would trade decentralization for 100% centralization and corporation control willingly.
Everyone can collect random punchlines from chat rooms and throw them randomly one after another. You never kept two posts on the same topic. Complete waste of time (and blockchain).
This what I dislike the most in the authoritarian #CultOfCraig. You would trade decentralization for 100% centralization and corporation control willingly.
Please ignore me. I have no will to have 100 subjects at the same time in the conversation and constantly adding new ones, so you can pretend you know what you are talking about.
Dude. Get an apprenticeship at any datacentre or high scale storage provider.
Wanting to mix storage and a payment system on mainnet is PURE retardation.
Your mind is living in the past. There is no mainnet in data centers. Just a separation of concerns which can be also achieved on bitcoin but with several orders less of complexity.
An intrinsic advantage of the bitcoin as a data carrier is that it uses the same blockchain to record both payments and content data. When adding script and stable protocol to the mix you have an
#unfuckening.
Storing data on a bitcoin has the obvious advantage that a payment mechanism is built into the system. It's possible to develop payperview of encrypted data. The complexity of every data solution is low.
Try yours.org if you have some digital content trying to make money on. Memo is an alternative to twitter where you don't need to sell your privacy and content is not censorable.
Providing a opened developing progress is a better choice. But I haven't found that. Open participation is important for open source projects. We can get more confidence.
Anyone can build a node and compete. Professional transparent node implementation which is not open to random people to mess with is a better approach. There is a bug bounty though.
Providing a opened developing progress is a better choice. But I haven't found that. Open participation is important for open source projects. We can get more confidence.
Everyone can use the protocol as designed and compete from there. Bitcoin is not a jobless developers sandpit for their stupid experimentation. The protocol was defined by Satoshi.
Who had all the bitprim nodes? lol
Let me try to use an example. There might be more sustainable revenue (fees) created from memo users than from speculators and especially holders. Speculators are hardly users.
While I certainly think scaling big is the crucial factor, the main problem to overcome is to make subsidies a minor factor in the incentives scheme. Establish road to sustainability
Speculators seem to be important right now. But rather sooner than later they won't matter, only users will. Otherwise, we are stuck with inflation schedule and bitcoin will die.
Because miners revenue is still driven by subsidies. But like every subsidy, it creates markets distortion. As a speculators node, it will have no power when the price is decoupled.
Core hijacked Satoshis invention and bastardized it to a socialist experiment where POW doesn't matter and your full node gives you voting rights. Also zero conf works.
I wrote a bit about sustainability of bitcoins security model and why opening doors to second layer may not be the best idea in the long term.
https://link.medium.com/GPlhGx8RWT
