LOL that's not paraphrasing at all, "node" is even shorter than "miner" jackass. Please keep talking, you're doing an excellent job of discrediting yourself for me
OMG... paraphrasing has nothing to do with shortening. It's the meaning dude. "I am small and can't compete, big guys bad, big guys centraliseeeed!!"
"It's easy because of the pixels" lol. You're spouting bullshit mate, admit it.
No, that would be you. One example, Coingeek had around 1.000PH for 6 months and before fork they brought another 1.000PH, right now they use 250PH on BSV.
More bullshit nonsense from a #Faketoshi zealot.
If you really cared about miners then you would be on BTC.
Miners mine what is profitable. They care not to suck a chain dry on the short term. But their investments are aligned with long term sustainability of the network.
You just said that BCH's roadmap was to "accept the Bitcoin protocol", are you saying that BCH accepts its own protocol if you aren't talking about BTC? Because that's a given, nutso
Maybe in your world BTC is still bitcoin. But in mine, it lost too much of original design to still be called bitcoin. Hence if it wouldn't there would be no need for BCH/BSV forks.
The ideologues made me move away from it as well though, if you strip away the scapegoats and bullshit marketing, CSW doesn't really have anything to sell. Plus that Centralized Calvin
You sound like core 2.0. It's just 2017 all over again.
I'll trade you BSV for your remaining BCH 1:1 if it means that you'll stop shitposting here, I'd happily make that investment to have you babbling on the loony blockchain you belong on
You just gave me purpose. I might keep them now. 🤪
It seems like wormhole was a cheap attempt to compete with ETH and Gabriel is nr1 zelout for ETH as he stated numerous times. He also forked metamask and made badger.
This what I dislike the most in the authoritarian #CultOfCraig. You would trade decentralization for 100% centralization and corporation control willingly.
Everyone can collect random punchlines from chat rooms and throw them randomly one after another. You never kept two posts on the same topic. Complete waste of time (and blockchain).
This what I dislike the most in the authoritarian #CultOfCraig. You would trade decentralization for 100% centralization and corporation control willingly.
Please ignore me. I have no will to have 100 subjects at the same time in the conversation and constantly adding new ones, so you can pretend you know what you are talking about.
Dude. Get an apprenticeship at any datacentre or high scale storage provider.
Wanting to mix storage and a payment system on mainnet is PURE retardation.
Your mind is living in the past. There is no mainnet in data centers. Just a separation of concerns which can be also achieved on bitcoin but with several orders less of complexity.
An intrinsic advantage of the bitcoin as a data carrier is that it uses the same blockchain to record both payments and content data. When adding script and stable protocol to the mix you have an #unfuckening.
Storing data on a bitcoin has the obvious advantage that a payment mechanism is built into the system. It's possible to develop payperview of encrypted data. The complexity of every data solution is low.
Try yours.org if you have some digital content trying to make money on. Memo is an alternative to twitter where you don't need to sell your privacy and content is not censorable.
Providing a opened developing progress is a better choice. But I haven't found that. Open participation is important for open source projects. We can get more confidence.
Anyone can build a node and compete. Professional transparent node implementation which is not open to random people to mess with is a better approach. There is a bug bounty though.