No KYC if not high amounts. I split my BSV 1st. Again, watch the minimums. When I deposited my second batch of BSV, I couldn't trade it, because it was not >= 0.1.
I would second that, but beware of all their minimums! I ran into some of those. Each trade has to be for at least 0.1 BSV, and there are minimums for deposit and withdrawals.
Many years ago I'd just moved to area & wanted to cash a paycheck from a Chase acct. Even w/ ID they refused. I said it says "Pay to the order of" they said that's not what that means.
would be cool to have a new memo function where you make a special post/txn on your current wallet designating the new one as you updated identity.
Superb idea! I'm will attempt to split my BSV by sending my address a tiny amount of split BCH, then consolidating all my UTXOs. That TX should be invalid on BSV so cannot be replayed.
I know you can't be sure how many UTXOs each wallet has, so I guess estimate based on total UTXOs that exist.
I wonder because I thought "What if every single user wanted to split their BCH from their BSV by consolidating all their UTXOs with some already split ones." How feasible would it be?
OK Math whizzes, can anyone estimate the cost in TX fees and the size of all the TXs (# 32MB blocks) to consolidate everyone's wallets into a single UTXO per wallet.
I know you can't be sure how many UTXOs each wallet has, so I guess estimate based on total UTXOs that exist.
OK Math whizzes, can anyone estimate the cost in TX fees and the size of all the TXs (# 32MB blocks) to consolidate everyone's wallets into a single UTXO per wallet.
I'm in the US and have done this very recently. Not huge amounts, but no problem. Didn't even need an ID. Have you tried to do it? How do you know they will not?
My hope is that if we get critical mass on crypto being used, the Feds will have to abandon that reasoning and just treat using it as a regular non-taxable event.
They could still tax people doing actual "trading" I suppose, like on exchanges. I can't declare a loss because my USD are losing value each year.
*Most* interesting to me is that this really shakes up the taxable event issue. We have a major company participating in a payment method with an undue regulatory burden.
My hope is that if we get critical mass on crypto being used, the Feds will have to abandon that reasoning and just treat using it as a regular non-taxable event.
*Most* interesting to me is that this really shakes up the taxable event issue. We have a major company participating in a payment method with an undue regulatory burden.
Today we came home from a mini family vacation. Nothing dramatic happened, but I hope the kids remember it anyway. #dailymemo
They may not "remember" it as a specific memory, but every experience that they have will build their personality & character, so it's worth it to give them happy experiences.
I've deposited cash in friend's checking when they were low & they paid me back the same way. Of course they have to trust you to give you their checking acct #.
Sounds scary to give check acct # to stranger, but can't get money from my acct w/o ID. Guess they could use online to pay bill, but seems like they would be easily caugh & chargedt.
I've deposited cash in friend's checking when they were low & they paid me back the same way. Of course they have to trust you to give you their checking acct #.
If seller or buyer raises dispute, either can unlock encrypted chat and bitcoin.com can review. Bitcoin.com, as escrow agent, has power to send BCH back to seller or to buyer.
The actual method of transferring fiat or whatever agreed exchange is (could be other things I imagine) is up to the buyer and seller. The categories are only to help search by buyer.