The seller can finalize escrow & send BCH to buyer if everything went as planned. What seller can't do is send BCH back to self. If dispute arises, then bitcoin.com gets involved
If seller or buyer raises dispute, either can unlock encrypted chat and bitcoin.com can review. Bitcoin.com, as escrow agent, has power to send BCH back to seller or to buyer.
The seller & buyer agree in an encrypted chat on terms to transmit fiat or whatever. The buyer does what is agreed to & posts proof, such as receipt, or seller sees deposit bank.
The seller can finalize escrow & send BCH to buyer if everything went as planned. What seller can't do is send BCH back to self. If dispute arises, then bitcoin.com gets involved
From what I can tell, a special escrow TX is created. This TX has special properties in that once it's created, there are only a few actions that can be taken.
The seller & buyer agree in an encrypted chat on terms to transmit fiat or whatever. The buyer does what is agreed to & posts proof, such as receipt, or seller sees deposit bank.
From what I can tell, a special escrow TX is created. This TX has special properties in that once it's created, there are only a few actions that can be taken.
How can you split your BSV out of your memo wallet? When I split before, I moved BCH & BSV to completely separate wallets. But for Memo, I have to keep the same wallet to maintain my identity, n'est-ce-pas?
I thought BSV was going to implement replay protection. Maybe I can taint my BCH balance, transfer it out, then transfer it back in. I want to move my BSV out, but keep my BCH in memo.
How can you split your BSV out of your memo wallet? When I split before, I moved BCH & BSV to completely separate wallets. But for Memo, I have to keep the same wallet to maintain my identity, n'est-ce-pas?
who did they consult with before adding the checkpoints?
Themselves. It's their version. Don't like it, run a different version, or fork their version and remove it, or don't upgrade. My point is, the checkpoints haven't actually been used.
He claims that adding new checkpoints to the system after SN had added the first, "censored" the chain. But, if checkpoints weren't added, the chains would be exactly as they are now.
On reddit? I think there's no on-chain transaction except when funding it or withdrawing. For tipping on reddit, it's just Adam Back style "tabs". That's how the old one used to work.
Woo, dumped by BSV while it was in its little pump. Such low volume on Coinex. Wish I could have done it back when it was closer to parity with BCH. Now I gotta round up all my spare sats hanging around.
User called LightRider. Local communist that screams "fucking capitalists" a lot & fails to realize that socialism is incompatible with a free society & uncensorable media like BCH.
Whenever a headline starts with "Scientists say" or "Experts warn" I'm immediately skeptical. These are very weaselly words that imply authority, but overlook the fact that the "experts" aren't always in agreement.
In fact, those experts often will admit that, although they believe one theory is more probable in their opinion, there is not definitive proof either way. So examine the evidence!
Whenever a headline starts with "Scientists say" or "Experts warn" I'm immediately skeptical. These are very weaselly words that imply authority, but overlook the fact that the "experts" aren't always in agreement.
I'm still looking for one person that changed teams from BCH *to* BTC. I've seen the converse many times now. Anyone find one in the wild that is legit?