And I plan to mine BCH even if it goes to $0 to fight. I’ve made so much, I can fight for years.
Am glad you can do that! Not sure how many others would be able to join you on that mission
Well he’s not mining alone, is that what you mean? Anyone can join the SVpool. I have 100% of my hashpower directed at SVpool.
Are you going to continue on that path if BCHSV's market price goes to 0?
😬😬😬 yikes
That’s definitely putting all your eggs in one basket.
Yeah, more so because of how zero-sum like this battle is turning out to be. All or nothing...
Like to have a price pop doesn't mean the price will go up right?
Also, by the looks of it, this would be anything but cheap PR. lol
Another reason I think the price will rise is that, whoever wins the war will like to have a big price pop to confirm that "that's what investors/the community really wanted". It's BS of course, but cheap PR.
Like to have a price pop doesn't mean the price will go up right?
What good will mining alone do?
I'd rather create a Bitcoin Cryptopoly
CSW said he will mine even if BCH goes to $0. BCH miners for the win. Bye bye Jihan.
What good will mining alone do?
If both chains survive, will your still get an equal amount of BCHSV & BCHABC?
BCHSV only, its essentially futures.
Node count isn't everything but it sure paints a picture
https://imgur.com/a/11E1pya
"The fervor of the reddit and twitter troll campaigns kicked into high gear right as BCH went from $415 to $630. This price increase was caused when Bitcoin.com and Coinbase announced that they would follow the
Binance and the ability to make money out of nothing are likely at play too
For a feather attack they don't need suck hashpower. It was explained by a memo user a few days ago.
Missed that. If only memo had search...
Think that is because the ABC proponents have not pushed their hashpower over to BCH.
Despite that, the futures market on Poloniex maintains a 80-20 distribution in ABC's favour
Think that is because the ABC proponents have not pushed their hashpower over to BCH.
Gosh I need to bring Memo up to speed. SV has 60-70% of the hashrate. https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-cash/blocks
Despite that, the futures market on Poloniex maintains a 80-20 distribution in ABC's favour
Do you have proof that miners didn't do that? I know you don't, I also question miners (as everyone else) because they showed to not being able to rely on during BTC scaling debate.
Entirely possible, and you're right I wouldn't know. I'd like to think that everyone works towards maximisation of their own profits
100000 satoshi to someone who can explain what DSV is
Human understandable answers for incomprehensible questions
I have one new perspective since 32MB blocks were mined: could it be that during stress test miners didn't want to mine 32MB blocks so that they can say original code can't scale?
Much conspiracy. Could be wrong but I always thought its computationally ineffective to pack so many transactions in one block since the main mining reward is coming from the coinbase
ahahahhaah. I don't get the incentive though, filling up 32MB and then computing hashes on that would surely require more computation in the already hyper competitive mining world
How does one justify a larger than 32MB blocksize?
A 51% attack on ABC chain is difficult, but orphaning blocks and replaying txs is more easy.
Even if SV's hashpower was equal, SV would be inclined to mine their own transactions and keep new block time as close as possible to 10 min instead of using their wasting it on ABC
A 51% attack on ABC chain is difficult, but orphaning blocks and replaying txs is more easy.
Orphaning would only happen if SV's hashpower >= ABC thereby allowing SV to mine empty/erroneous blocks quicker than ABC hence forming the longest proof of work chain. Seems unlikely
Does this mean the bottlenecks have been fixed?
What bottlenecks? BCH had pretty much had empty blocks no?
As per Poloniex's futures market, an 80-20 split is expected in ABC's favour. Given the next mining difficulty adjustment some 2016 blocks away, SV miners could suffer a lack of profitability for the some 10 weeks?
