This block is taking some time. Let's hope for a big one!
@modulus "Just don't make bugs, easy!" You're adding an exeption to the rule, it's going to trip people up without adding any benifit. And might cause problems with future expansion.
@modulus Why would you do that though? Seems like asking for bugs.
Why is BP so unpopular? I know it's broken in my browser but it can't be a common thing.
For me, Memo just caught my eye first. And my first impression of BP is that it's a twitter ripoff, while memo has it's own thing going.
@Maladey, there is an option to disable images and videos in the settings.
I meant a mute feature in the memo client, not the protocol. And so far the good guys are heavily outweighing the bad guys.
@Maladey That's easy to ignore and move past though. And memo is still young, a mute feature will surely get there.
Hopefully the future will view the message above from a purely historical perspective.
@Maladey, was hoping for some wholesome messages. First thing I see, not so much 😐
Then maybe we should start a topic "Messages to the Future".
@eric How would @name tagging work? Names aren't unique, are they?
Can confirm, works without adblock.
Clicking the languages below doesn't work for me.
> Hi, we have developed a social network with immutable and decentralized messaging. > Cool, just what I was looking for! But make them mutable and centralized.
@boudi Simpler would be not to use blockchain..., use twitter.
@boudi That would destroy the openness of memo, other services would be missing messages. Also, those messages might be decrypted with future tech.
Is there a way to send a text through BCH but not saved on the Blockchain?
Something like Counterparty/Omni; secured by BCH but not stored on BCH itself if I understand correctly
You could store a hash of the message on-chain, so the tx would only verify a message, not store it. This way, if logs get leaked, they can be verified.
