To the creators of Memo: You guys came up with such a great name. It's perfect.
"Did you see my memo?"
Not to mention memo.cash has such a nice ring to it. (memo.sv, not so much)
#dailymemo
Recent interview I did with shitcoin.com about Bitcoin Cash privacy. Covers CashShuffle and Neutrino. Let me know what you think!
I really dislike how most of crypto discussion and media attention is more on price/speculation and not on usability as a currency. Adoption is achieved because of merchants and customers, not because of price.
Eratosthenes: bullshit
Copernicus: bullshit
Galileo: bullshit
Newton: bullshit
Some college dropout living in his mom's basement: gospel
The flat earth "movement" is made up of uneducated rubes
Lol people have to buy BCH to pay a network fee in order to use tokens, and even if they didn't, thousands of shops accepting tokens built on BCH would be amazing for publicity
It's important to drive as much onchain adoption as possible, so that there are enough transactions for miners to collect the fees to cover mining costs after block rewards are dropped
Announcing the all new CoinSpice Show. Corentin Mercier, a skilled developer in the Bitcoin Cash ecosystem, joins Hayden Otto on the channel as co-hosts.
#bitcoin #bitcoincash #podcast
Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin, deal with it!
what is your confidence level in those numbers? it looks like they have been hard at work on the node
how to troll the ABC-chain - have an extended multi-day stress-test, by creating ~50MB worth of TXs every 10 mins -> SV will eat all of it while ABC will fall over, accumulate a queue worthy of BTC; ABC-fees will moon
You know very well that SV can not handle 50MB every 10 minutes. The sustained throughput is around 10-15MB every 10 minutes.
exactly right, they don't understand it because most of the people are highly brainwashed and they don't even know it
Are you tired of all the SV drama on here and prefer to engage in productive discussion about any manner of possibilities that life holds?
| Yes! |
2 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
| Absolutely! |
2 votes
· 546 satoshis
|
| No doubt about it! |
0 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
| SV was so last month. Already over it. Who wants to build a seastead? |
2 votes
· 0 satoshis
|
Results
Creating...
Broadcasting...
CSW didn't attack BCH, Roger and Jihan did by forking away from the white paper, and removing nakamoto consensus.
If it wasn't for them BCH would be over $1000 right now.
Sooo salty.
Adding op codes no body asked for and that are not in the white paper.
Adding pre consensus. (Avalanche)
Adding Checkpoints.
And it's worth it! Anything to make the trolls salty!
But if someone puts something in the chain that Amaury doesn't like his nudes they'll checkpoint them out. That's impossible in all other Bitcoin implementations 🎅🤷
LOL. The name, CHECKPOINT, means that something is checkpointed IN, not out. You silly troll!
What was changed to allow larger OP_RETURN in the May 2018 fork? Longer script allowance?
Yes, max scripts 201 => 500 on the SV side.
Not related to the question.
"SV" is capitalist. "sv" is lowercasist. "Sv" is a melting pot of cases.
Anyone in ABC memo has his coins splitted? Please tip this post so I can split them too.
Anyone in ABC memo has his coins splitted? Please tip this post so I can split them too.
You have to consolidate them with already split coin in some external wallet. I used Electron Cash. Since then, I received many new tips, and don't know if they are split, too.
Hmm, I'm confusing it with maybe something else. I thought bitcoinSV wanted to raise a limit of opcodes or something like that. Thanks for correcting !
Yes the script length which is the # of op-codes, but not the payload size of the op_return which is a single op-code.
It should be the same complexity as normal sig verify but I guess you can put many of them in one TX. Otherwise Ryan's point about DSV being a subsidy doesn't make sense.
True, it really doesn't make sense.
