The only big businesses interested in ABC are unlicensed gambling and moneychangers.
Gambling is the core of Bitcoin's early success. "Unlicensed"? Bitcoin is above jurisdictions. No court can delete this memo. Moving forward OP_RETURN and DSV will enable so much more
Roger Ver's thoughts on the upcoming Bitcoin Cash upgrade taking place on November 15th
I'm not crazy about rushing CTOR & prefer NOFORK for now, but definitely not interested in anything that a group associated with that CSW nutjob proposes.
Blockpress died because the site didnt work for half the people trying to use it, myself included; never even got past registering with it. Memo definitely could use a more friendly UX
I'm not a fan of CSW by any means. But I find myself agreeing with him this time. I believe miners should take steps to hiring devs to implement what they want. I'd like to see others follow CoinGeek's steps.
It's uncensorable because it is stored on the blockchain. If IPFS suffices for storage then why would you need to use the blockchain at all?
Because there isn't ownership in IPFS. The blockchain allows identity ownership. Also, all transactions are viewed the same as long as you pay, so communications (txs) aren't censored
It's uncensorable because it is stored on the blockchain. If IPFS suffices for storage then why would you need to use the blockchain at all?
Because there isn't ownership in IPFS. The blockchain allows identity ownership. Also, all transactions are viewed the same as long as you pay, so communications (txs) aren't censored
The LN is a 2nd decentralized network that uses the BTC network.
In itself it doesn't change BTC by the very fact that it is a second layer technology.
Limiting the blocksize does of course change BTC. The LN doesn't.
LN would actually be useful for micro-transactions (less than a penny) for pay as you go services. But it cannot be a replacement for the blockchain, like blockstream is pushing for.
I dont think there's any way to know if this is real for sure. The paper however has a lot of details on the birth of bitcoin, lending some credibility to author's claim.
Memo update released: - Dust consolidation for all actions - Dashboard is now a feed of all events - Performance improvements - Updated profiles - Color indicator for relative user rating - New account page
Yes freedom -- but that freedom exposes the culture for what it is... and in this case, yes it is a problem. Not the freedom but what is in the hearts.
Its not freedom when people with 1 set of political ideas control the supply of money and hand it out to media outlets that support their idealogy, stifling all dissenting opinion.
#DOGE works better than #BTC. Nobody committed anything for a while. It has no RBF, no segwit, no full blocks policy. In other words technocrats did not destroy it with their micromanaged central planning mentality.
SatoshiDice.com was once the most popular application in all of crypto, now that we are back on track with Bitcoin Cash, give us a try again. http://satoshidice.com
I love it.. I think you're a bit beyond me with some of this stuff, but I wanted to point out paste.city for example does exactly the post/update txt files thing for free now.
I haven't been hooked on a site like this since first discovering Reddit and Twitter. As someone that has been fairly active for a little over a week now... This is a big deal. Game-changer, for sure.
Of course, the messages wouldn't be stored in the blockchain forever, but I think for private/direct messages that's actually fine/what you'd want. Anyway, any thoughts/problems? :)