If people want to be mean to me on this platform, that's okay.
Just understand I can be much more mean and ruthless with my comments.
You were mean to me so now I'm not interested in being nice anymore.
You will catch my ire if you come across my sights.
Gonna cry?
Gonna piss ur pants maybe?
Maybe piss and shit?
Maybe cum while farting?
Maybe cum and shit?
Maybe piss while farting?
Maybe fart while shitting?
Maybe shit
and
Cum?
IF YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE HEAT STAY OUT THE KITCHEN, I'M ON A MISSION
I understand it, still doesn't stop natural law from being based in theological reasoning. And my view is anything theologically based usually lacks critical thinking.
If I'm at war and I kill a terrorist I didn't have the terrorist's consent to kill him.
Okay, then literally name me the policy proposal you state promotes liberty.
What is the name of policy?
What does that mean?
What was the policy that you say you voted for a new liberty?
We're finally getting somewhere. Tell me more about this new liberty. What was the policy?
You haven't told me your policies because you literally don't have any. The one you mentioned was "Civics in Education" which literally doesn't mean anything when Civics and Social Studies are already taught in school.
If both parties consent. There's also the other adage of you can literally inflict pain on anyone if you enjoy it, but the consequences would be jail time.
Or you become a boxer where you can beat the shit out of people for fun.
There are loopholes.
And that goes to my next point. Name me a policy proposal that is focused on providing "more liberty" because wtf does that even mean? You're not saying anything.
"I propose a policy of more liberty!"
Like okay? Wtf does that even mean?
Well, if you're talking politics you better come prepared with actual policy.
Literally the only thing politics is about is POLI-cy that's why it's called POLI-tics.
That's why I called you an unserious hack, because you're not interested in POLICY.
No, I'm just poking holes in your flawed logic. You said, "If I like pain can I inflict pain?" You said no.
I said yes assuming you were a Dominatrix where your job is to literally inflict pain on willing subjects.
Masochists literally consent to have pain inflicted upon them.
I've dated several women who were into getting slapped during sex.
I just found a loophole in your claim, "if I like pain can I inflict pain?" and the answer is yes, if both parties consent.
Your view of government being evil isn't unfounded, I don't disagree. I disagree insofar that policy goals are nonsense. I give you substance and you give me shit on a plate and called it policy substance ie "The Culture War," or "Civics in Education"
If you like pain, you can inflict pain, if you're Dominatrix. There are masochists who will pay you to inflict pain upon them, so I literally don't understand your rationale.
Yeah, of course Lincoln was a racist POS that doesn't override reality that Southern States seceded because of slavery.
Natural Law just sounds like theological nonsense to me that says human beings possess intrinsic values that govern our reasoning and behavior. I am saying discussions on right from wrong are complex discussions on ethics, morality, etc.
This is not vague in the slightest, stop being uneducated about the Civil War
Civil War was literally over slavery you cannot override reality of Southern states saying they are seceding from the union because of Slavery. How do you not know history?
If you are of the Aristotle school of thought deciding right from wrong is the golden mean between two vices. This is why I say you need nuance. Or is right from wrong, do unto others what would be done unto you? These are complex questions.
I give you an actual thought out answer and I’m the idiot? Bro, you’re projecting.
I call you a hack because you can’t name me any policy goals when talking about politics. That’s called being a hack
Society, as is decided by the majority, decides what rights are.
Otherwise countries like Germany, Sweden, the US all wouldn’t have a different amount of rights.
This is why you all sound so silly
What is natural law? Define it for me.
And right from wrong is subjective based on your view of whether you’re a utilitarian or some other philosophical school of thought.
Nuance is required in every discussion.
Bro, you couldn’t name me a single policy related to what it is you believe. You don’t even understand Bitcoin. Don’t be calling people retarded when you lack basic knowledge
You literally don’t understand the point of BitCoin, go read Craig Wright’s book Satoshi’s Vision: the Art of Bitcoin because you clearly don’t understand Bitcoin let alone politics or policy.
