People who can think for themselves and do not need a king/president to tell them what to think/do. Rules without rulers. Like crypto. I think people who want to be ruled prefer BSV ;)
And if Roger or Aumary do something you don't like with ABC what will you do?
I'm not exactly sure what ABC's value proposition is anymore. Tell me, what is "Bitcoin" cash? What does it do? What is it for? Competition will kill off useless dead wood.
I think it makes it more profitable for miners on the SV pool to get more BSV since CoinGeek dropped their hashpower. I’m assuming that’s the reason.
Yeah this is just the next phase of the war. No re-org necessary if it's unprofitable to mine. And they can dump just enough on the market to keep them under water for months.
😵Mike noooo! Please approve of me 😭😭
Oh thaaaaats why coingeek dropped their hashrate. Difficulty adjustment. Very clever.
The only reason you get 30% discounts is so people can buy bitcoins with Amazon cards that they payed for with cash. Once DSV privacy apps happen say bye bye to your discount.
You assume the 30% discount will continue to that point. You haven't factored in the fact that the discount exists because of a bottleneck that wouldn't exist in that scenario.
I have bought a lot of stuff and saved a lot of money. It's a current talking point to get people using it. How many times can you talk about "Adoption is key"? That's obvious.
Enough people won't expose themselves to the risk of losing 70% for a few 30% coupons. Not nearly enough to replace the block reward.
It's 2.99 for 100.00 of BCH. which is 3%. I always do 29% on Purse. I do it all the time. Big savings.
This is starting to feel like an ABC talking point. I think I bought exactly one thing on Amazon this year. That's not enough txns to pay miners when the block reward halves.
Great, move the goalpost why dont you. I was correcting you when you said no one will accept Bitcoin untill the blocksize is increased.
You win. You're right. Small blocks forever!!
The price can only stabilize when the majority of coins are distributed between people. We need to create more demand for BCH first.
Right, the delusion is in the expectation that it'll be in demand for monetary usage any time soon. It won't! You need to be able to use it as a unit of account.
Again, the block reward will not be replaced by fees with only a handful of hobbyists making two or three payments per week. Mass adoption cannot happen until risk is removed.
Goverments are the biggest gangsters in town. Gangsters are not the problem, a free society can keep them in check. People who want to be ruled and legitimize rulership are the problem
Define "free society".
&app=desktop
That's great but most people aren't going to buy $100 of Bitcoin(and pay a 5-10% fee) just to buy something on Amazon. purse.io is for holders and that means exposure to RISK
Ordering doesn't need to be on-chain. Look at plants, arbitrary ordering is done by the flowers and leaves, not the roots. Relay nodes need to be paid to do the heavy ordering.
The argument is that a big miner can DoS the network by tying up a big block in knots. This is stupid for multiple reasons described in the white paper.
Not a chicken and egg problem at all. The blocksize is not what businesses look at when considering accepting Bitcoin. Adoption first increase the blocksize as needed.
Let me repeat, there will be NO massive adoption of Bitcoin as money until the price swings are within a small range year to year. It will be a commodity ledger first, or it will die.
Not a chicken and egg problem at all. The blocksize is not what businesses look at when considering accepting Bitcoin. Adoption first increase the blocksize as needed.
The normiest NPC answer possible, as expected. It doesn't matter if freaking Amazon accepts Bitcoin for payments, no one will use Bitcoin as money until the price stabilizes.
government calls the "wrong" opinion hate speech and arrest you. they do not want literate people. they want order followers. Educated people could question the necessity of rulership
Right that's why you have to have a government that naturally limits itself. You don't want anarchy because whatever gangster is in charge will not limit him/herself. That's tyranny.
Only if regular blocks were anywhere near 32 MB would I think the increase was needed. Considering ABC will handle big blocks better than any other blockchain it is clear they are best
Getting a random restaurant to take payments from hobbyists is not going to make up for the block reward halving. If we don't get butt tons of txns on chain ASAP Bitcoin WILL DIE.
Only if regular blocks were anywhere near 32 MB would I think the increase was needed. Considering ABC will handle big blocks better than any other blockchain it is clear they are best
Chicken and egg problem. There won't be any large businesses interested if it's not already demonstrably possible for them to put a half gig of txns on chain every day.
René Descartes - the original author of "The Matrix"
Good example. Melting T of iron is 1500 C. If there is any iron in the lander, it should have melted. Have you seen the vape and the truck vid? The 1500 C air comes around the shield .
stability!=state. third world rushing to europe because of free tax money. european rulers needs instability to increase there power.
more instability>more rules > more power >more tax
If there are no checks on state power(like decent elections, separated branches of government, free speech protected with government force, literate population etc.) you have tyranny.
