This is terrible advice. You’ll wind up in legal trouble, injured, or dead. You always comply with law enforcement, then let the courts decide if it was unjust.
6a = OP_RETURN, 02 = push 2 bytes, 6d02 = the pushed data, 4c = OP_PUSHDATA4, 83 = push 131 bytes, then the bytes. All BCH inputs/outputs follow a special language.
Sorry, PUSHDATA1. Data is broken up by the size of the integer representing the data length.
6a = OP_RETURN, 02 = push 2 bytes, 6d02 = the pushed data, 4c = OP_PUSHDATA4, 83 = push 131 bytes, then the bytes. All BCH inputs/outputs follow a special language.
An array is not a substitute for a backup.
Me too. I made the switch a while ago. Wish Apple would make it default.
Everyone. But I really need to use Activity for the filtering.
Bitcoin Cash along with VISA, Mastercard and Swift has solved the scaling problem by not being decentralised
Each post you make is a contribution to BCH miners. Thank you!
He would re-license open tech with a new limited license and then charge for already free data.
Let's spread Memo in other decentralised social media platforms like steemit , weku , whaleshares , trybe , sapien , golos etc.,
Thanks aschatria for bringing me here :)
Hah. That's called a group text.
Right. For example, if you trust the @memo account and they trust me, you can likely also trust that I'm really me. But the whole system depends on honest first-hand knowledge.
🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀🧀
I’ve had almost an entire bottle of 🍷 and that makes the cheese posts even more funny 😂😂🤤
10k accounts and counting on local.bitcoin.com
Seeing some serious growth over the last couple days. Michael still hammering more features into our p2p trading platform with non custodial escrow. Feels good! 🐸
I've asked many times for someone to link to a transaction on the blockchain from this service. Do you have any example transactions using their escrow script?
It's more accurate to say semi-anonymous. Cash shuffle doesn't provide anonymity so much as it provides deniability. Whomever spends shuffled coins may or may not be the your target.
I have a specification for that but have been far too busy to implement it.
Yes that is my understanding although I had no such issues with my transaction.
I appreciate you sharing your experience.
So the FIAT didn't go into escrow. It went straight to the seller who then releases the BCH from escrow. If the seller does not release it then you can initiate a dispute.
In the case of a dispute, does the arbitrator simply release the BCH to the buyer if the seller does not?
The seller puts the BCH into escrow until they receive the funds from you. Then the BCH is released into your wallet.
If the BCH is escrowed on the blockchain, where is the fiat escrowed?
It was really good. You basically just chat with the seller via an encrypted chat window and exchange payment info. Best of all, no KYC!
How is that any different than approaching a random person on the internet? Without escrow, what will protect both the buyer and seller?
So when BCH has terabyte blocks and nobody can validate the chain anymore. Why use a blockchain and not a regular database, or why not switch to EOS like DPoS as PoW is meaningless in this "trust the miners" scenario.
In 1995.... "hey, we'll probably run out of IPv4 addresses with all this growth...why even waste time on this internet thing since it won't scale?"
Are you using the reference implementation in Go?
Stencil? Or tape it off first?
And browsers support desktop notifications, too.
That was one example of having direct knowledge. There are many, many ways to establish decentralized trust.
