scriptSig

Joined Sep 04, 2018

Profile not set

Mute
1PDBscfDpVrfZShDANtG9uaRumsBFnMDbK
Actions 423
Following 6
Followers 16
Topics following 5
Muted 6
Is Muted By 1

replied 1860d
I’d prefer the old PGP key sign trust. You vouch for someone because you personally know or met to verify. Someone you trust vouching for another means you can likely trust too.
replied 1860d
Well, a miner could include that. It’s just considered a non-standard TX and not relayed by the nodes.
replied 1860d
Toomin had a great idea about doing UDP torrent style downloads from the nodes, including MTU path discovery
replied 1860d
You're contributing to the problem by posting. Better stop wasting space on my hard drive.
replied 1861d
What’s this? What happened to 🧀
replied 1861d
Encrypting provides confidentiality and some authentication but does not address things like forward secrecy or repudiation.
replied 1861d
Georg Engelmann
Please don't consider that a secure means of communicating. There are many issues with simply encrypting a message.
replied 1994d
painlord2k
I'm speaking specifically about dApp services. There is no privacy on services like Memo because you already know I'm using this address. Money sent to it is obviously for me.
replied 1995d
🧀
🧀
🧀
🧀
replied 1997d
Hmmm, ok, you sold me. I agree with that 👍
replied 1997d
With all the dApps showing up, UTXO bloat is going to become a real thing. There needs to be a middle ground.
sent · 546 sats 1997d
Testing. Every time I try to reply I get a CloudFlare error.
replied 1997d
SuperHacker
And he has 110 UTXO. Site owners need to be more responsible with their UTXO. Each action should consolidate the user's UTXO.
replied 2000d
One can only hope 😁
replied 2000d
If one gets added, I hope it’s client side only. Broadcasting a mute would let the person know the posts become ineffective so they change identities.
replied 2000d
Hmmm, I can see the artifacts and splitting the channels shows 16x16 blocks of data. But I don’t see any steganography data 🤷‍♂️
replied 2000d
Did you hide the private key to 1 BCH in that pic? 😂
replied 2001d
"Cashshuffle helps" = agree, much like VPN or TOR "helps." But it still provides probable cause because just using the service puts you on a list. Do not rely on it for anonymity.
replied 2001d
Sure, just send me 1 BCH and I'll take care of that pizza for you.
replied 2001d
I’m talking about how identities are compromised, not an attack on Bitcoin. Search for “Ross Ulbricht”, “Roman Seleznev”, “Abu Omar.”
replied 2001d
Not VPS, VPN. We’re talking about two very different things that are used for entirely different reasons.
2002d
Explanation of how private keys work and why you already know every private key: https://honest.cash/scriptSig/allkeyscash-all-bitcoin-cash-private-keys-1209
replied 2002d
It’s like VPN. Your data does in, everybody’s data comes out, they still match stuff. Except blockchain is pub so you don’t even need the pen reg.
replied 2002d
Feds aren’t looking for an exact match, just enough for probable cause. You put coins in, and the second they match you to any coins out that’s enough.
replied 2003d
Every Bitcoin transaction is traceable back to its coinbase origin. Do not mistake signal-to-noise ratio with anonymity.